So, this means Biden could totally just order Trump killed right now and it’d be 100% legal.

permalink
report
reply
107 points

Supreme court Justices also…just sayin.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Using “I was going to vote for Joe Biden after the immunity ruling, but he refuses to blow up the SC Justices before they overturn gay marriage so I won’t” as a reason now lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points
*

They literally have no excuses anymore. Everything that democratic voters insist that their guy wanted to do but couldn’t is 100% doable now. With the power of legal assasination given to the presidency, all that shit would now be possible. That dems won’t do it is proof of their lack of interest or conviction in their stated goals

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

I encourage Joe Biden to gather all the right wing state governors and every single Republican he can for a grand July 4th celebration with an announcement. Tell them he wants to discuss something with immigration and funding from the federal government… that’ll probably get them to show up. Just a big ol’ freedom BBQ in and around the Capitol building.

And then he can do the funniest thing in history

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

fund yourself and fund everyone around you

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

the RNC two seconds later

permalink
report
parent
reply

Shame biden could/would never pull this off

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Kill them too before they rule against him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points

The fact that SCOTUS did this knowing the democrats won’t actually take advantage of this golden opportunuty to consolidate power really says it all

permalink
report
parent
reply

Oh no that would be bad and wrong, he’d have to put Trump on an international terrorism list first, THEN he could do what Obama did and murder Trump and his children with a drone strike

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Imagine Matt Miller and Kirby telling the press gaggle that there would be an internal investigation into the alleged drone striking of an ex-president

“It’s tough cookies, folks. Look. Donald Trump wasn’t a good guy. And hey, I get it, and we’re investigating. But you know what? I don’t hear any of you talking about what he did on Jan 6. Did you forget? I didn’t and President Biden didn’t either. It’s a tragic thing that his entire extended family is dead. I agree! But let’s not forget who he was and what he did. It’s real tough, folks. So let the pentagon look into it, and we’ll let you know. Alright anymore questions? No more about Trump.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Look, at this time it’s impossible for you to know- for anyone to know, what happened at Mar a Lago. Okay? Now, (speaking over the reporter) NOW, the Republicans are saying one thing, and the Pentagon hasn’t completed their investigation. We’re going to wait for the results of that investigation, but what I will say is there’s reason to believe that Mar a Lago was being used to store military hardware.

permalink
report
parent
reply

FBI crime statistics, but for President-on-President violence

permalink
report
parent
reply

Misfired hamas missile that came back down and hit mar a Lago. Because it was actually fired from Mar a Lago. Secret hamas base all along.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Actually it was an Orange Dome missile run by the Florida State Guard, time to invade Florida for blowing up a president.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m far from knowledgeable on constitutional law, but skimming the linked ruling, it’s very vague and seems to basically say that the supreme Court gets to decide if something is constitutional or not. So a united executive branch and judicial branch can do whatever they want with impunity.

They say the president has absolute immunity from criminal persecution “for actions within his conclusive and preclu- sive constitutional authority.” And he also has presumptive immunity for “all his official acts.” And ofc I’m sure it’s up to the supreme to decide what qualifies an an official act, whether the presumptive immunity should be upheld, and whether an action is within the presidents “conclusive and precious I’ve constitutional authority”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Okay so just kill all the Republican court justices first, appoint new ones and have them rule the act an official one, then drone strike Mar-a-Lago. Simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Let’s be real. He’ll refuse to do anything meaningful with his power, hand over the dictatorship to Trump after losing, and then blame leftists and the youth while Trump removes everybody left of Romney from power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

giving the biden regime the green light to merc trump legally, but they’d rather give him a second term

permalink
report
reply

if he’s as bad as they say he is, it’s their moral imperative to k*ll him. It’s like how you have to off hitler if you have a time machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply

a MORAL IMPERATIVE to KILL someone? Um sweaty killing is always IMMORAL.

Unless the target is brown

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Where is orange on this scale

permalink
report
parent
reply

Um actually I would go back in time and vote against Hitler

permalink
report
parent
reply

I wouldn’t vote for Biden just because he droned Trump, but I would laugh very hard so I think he should do it

permalink
report
parent
reply

Listen jack…vote…worst, my sodlier son…I beat medicare, Trump too…Fat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

If I were Biden, I’d nuke Mar A Lago

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

It’s very hard for me to square that idea that trump is an existential threat who must be stopped by any means necessary, and the notion that Biden is allowed to do anything legally.

permalink
report
reply
83 points

Obama murdered a 16-year-old who wasn’t even accused of a crime and got away with it, but I guess the rules are different when the victim is Muslim

permalink
report
parent
reply

once again,

Death to America

permalink
report
parent
reply

I tried to explain this to libs back in 2018ish. If Trump is a fascist, why would voting him out do anything? Ya’ll are either being hyperbolic, or you’re being cowards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

Trump is a fascist, but that is because everyone in the U.S. government follows the logic of fascism, because neoliberalism is just fascism without the campy outfits. He just not a systemic-ending fascist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Neoliberalism is rainbow fascism

permalink
report
parent
reply

The issue is he’s an anti institutionalist corporate oligarch, which in a vacuum is neutral and par for the course, but in this case, one of the few things keeping America from completely coming apart at the seams are the institutions who want to make sure arsenic isn’t in kids’ toothpaste and shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

i mean yeah, that’s kinda my point

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

If Biden gets Trump assassinated by the CIA will it be considered official business?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

yeah, the decision says exercises of constitutional authority have immunity. they’re /presumed/ to be official acts. so if assassinations are covered by the president, he’s free to kill off his political enemies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

As commander in chief, ordering military objectives is a constitutionally declared duty of the president so it seems very clear to me as that’s a conclusive constitutional duty. This line seems relevant: “[…] President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclu- sive constitutional authority”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Why would they murder their biggest fan?

permalink
report
parent
reply

There was some reporting a while back about how the CIA wanted to assassinate Julian Assange and the Trump administration had to talk them down

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

the obvious rules based liberal solution to trump is fucking divest presidential powers, instead of giving even more expansive executive

permalink
report
parent
reply

Clearly if we don’t use power it’ll set a precedent of good behavior!

permalink
report
parent
reply

This is why you all need to vote. If we had blue judges in the Supreme Court this would have never happened. As long as you vote we will have democracy back in about 300 years.

permalink
report
reply
81 points

I know they won’t do it, but if Dems had any guts they would just explicitly challenge Marbury v. Madison, and just start ignoring Supreme Court decisions. You know the right wingers would do exactly that if they were in a similar predicament with a 6-3 liberal majority court.

permalink
report
reply

the SC completely invented their power from whole cloth and (almost) every subsequent administration has just gone with it

Democracy

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

People think that I’m crazy when I say the supreme Court is basically a toddler that adults are pretending has magical powers to not make them cry. It’s maddening, ignore the toddler!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

sorry i hated learning government in school, i know the president could pack the court but you’re telling me they aren’t even obligated to honor their decisions and ignore them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

The supreme court has no explicit constitutional mechanism or authority to enforce their decisions, so they literally made one up, the idea that when they declare a law unconstitutional it just suddenly stops being a law.

Everyone just goes along with it because the whole country was designed from the ground up to prevent good things and only elect people who want to prevent good things. But there’s literally no reason the rest of the government couldn’t just go “thanks for your opinion but we don’t gaf”

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments