134 points

Thing is, they’re partially right. Revolution means war and war is violent. Innocent people will be murdered. Sick children. Homeless people. The elderly. Perfectly healthy random people. Pets, wild animals, you name it. Stuff that shouldn’t have to die will die. That’s the nature of war.

The reason it’s still worth it is that we’re already at war. It’s just that largely only one side is waging that war. Innocent people are being murdered under the status quo every single day. Sick children, homeless people, the elderly, perfectly healthy random people, pets, wild animals, you name it. They’re already being murdered. Revolution only looks violent and unreasonable from the privileged position that the status quo isn’t violent.

permalink
report
reply

If you think it’s a tragedy when people can’t get their groceries and medicine, boy do I have some news for you!

permalink
report
parent
reply

See the “2 reigns of terror” quote

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

When a thousand people die in a day, it’s a tragedy. When a million die over the course of a century, it’s a statistic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

Man it’s a good thing structural violence isn’t a thing. Otherwise incremental reform (or more honestly, its vain pursuit under bourgeois democracy) would have its own death toll that is being assumed as the normal, immutable state of things

permalink
report
reply
30 points

The logical chain they’re missing is the fact that Capitalism is very literally using the sick and disabled as human shields - “Don’t hurt me, or little Timmy won’t get his chemotherapy!”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Tagging your essay with #de-radicalisation is literally the soyest thing imagibable

permalink
report
reply

Essay? This wouldn’t even get a C- if you turned this in at Highschool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

This is what you get when your idea of a revolution exists in a vacuum with no events preceding it or material conditions facilitating it.

This would be the best argument against revolution if revolutions occurred spontaneously after enough people believed in it.

It also assumes all life and society just comes to a screeching hault when the government changes hands. Until checks start bouncing, most people are just going to continue going to work and doing their jobs as normal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Why is someone up in the sky screaming “unfalsifiable orthodoxy?” What could the yellow sky man mean by that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

Why do people think the revolution is one singular magical eschatological even that will happen everywhere at the same time, and involves destryoing everything? Why did i believe that at one point? Where did that idea come from and why does it persist?

permalink
report
reply
58 points

Not reading history outside of fantasized media

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

This, only revolution you see in mass media/consciousness in the west puts it forth as some sort of pseudomaterialist rapture. When really history isn’t quite linear and easy, you could say revolutions began long before its obvious and it doesn’t matter what precious pearl-clutching scratched libs think, we’re already in several. You’ll get all sorts of flavors of slow and steady and quick fascistic collapse, which is what they desire in their scratched lil dark heart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Yeah I think a lot of people miss that revolutions are the culmination of decades or even centuries of contradictions between the ruling hegemony and evolving material conditions. But that doesn’t make for a good 90 minute action-adventure so instead that bit gets glossed over or presented as window dressing for the Great Man’s initiative.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Christian brainworms i think

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 437K

    Comments