https://x.com/wentisung/status/1793895169957507228
Dude works for the Australian National University and the Atlantic Council and can’t scrape up any better dirt than “textbook girl wear pants now 😭”
Am I the only runner here who was creeped out by how short the running shorts were in school? Like 13 year old me running track in school felt very violated.
i wore boy shorts (i am a boy just fyi or rather a man thing) and they were called basketball shorts and went past the knees. both boys and girl’s wore the same shorts because they were unisex so we never had that issue…
were there different kinds of clothing for each gendee in your school? we sorta had to buy ours from the school.
Also using the ‘USA has rule of law, CCP has rule by law’ trope for translation of 法治
Rule of law is when I make something up about the constitution to send you to prison.
They could just point out they made the kids whiter? Would be a far more normal dunk than whatever the hell this is.
I think it’s either a result of the printing or the photography. All the colors look washed out on the new version. Compare the blue around the title and the new one is lighter. Same with the track and the boy’s clothes.
Interesting that the reactionary is recuperating “gender self-expression” to describe girls wearing feminized clothes but not the normalized (in the 20th-21st century) crossdressing. Instead that’s described as communistic and sexless. Which is also interesting. What depths the Sinophobic reactionary brainpan has!
communistic and sexless.
Sinophobes malding about the Vocel police.
It’s interesting to compare with Westoid lib blob’s reaction to Japanese schools allowing girls to choose to wear pants, which is generally heralded as a progressive measure.
I think the reactionary is using sex in the other sense. Because they want to sex children. And since boys and girls are basically indistinguishable, this is done through hair and clothing. Call this socially-coerced sexing “gender expression” in order to court cultural feminists.
