https://x.com/wentisung/status/1793895169957507228

Dude works for the Australian National University and the Atlantic Council and can’t scrape up any better dirt than “textbook girl wear pants now 😭”

71 points

It’s my favorite thing when reactionaries post something cool and call it bad.

permalink
report
reply
71 points

I bet Chinese parents are really mad that their daughters aren’t being sexualized like Japanese school girls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

The Chinese yearn for the freedom of having grown mail solicit teenagers’ panties and sell them in public shops

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

Interesting that the reactionary is recuperating “gender self-expression” to describe girls wearing feminized clothes but not the normalized (in the 20th-21st century) crossdressing. Instead that’s described as communistic and sexless. Which is also interesting. What depths the Sinophobic reactionary brainpan has!

permalink
report
reply
45 points

communistic and sexless.

Sinophobes malding about the Vocel police.

It’s interesting to compare with Westoid lib blob’s reaction to Japanese schools allowing girls to choose to wear pants, which is generally heralded as a progressive measure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

I think the reactionary is using sex in the other sense. Because they want to sex children. And since boys and girls are basically indistinguishable, this is done through hair and clothing. Call this socially-coerced sexing “gender expression” in order to court cultural feminists.

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

a liberated woman is a horny and sexy woman

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Commodified sex objects to be sold on the market

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

truly a society free of repression

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

maybe its cold out, the boy is wearing pants and as science tells us girls get cold faster than boys. They’re also wearing long sleeves and their complexions have lightened. This is clearly the winter 1997 edition of this textbook.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

I wonder if Mr China Watcher would be just as mad if they gave the boys shorts and short sleeves in the new version? Xi is feminizing the men? Chinese children so hungry they lack body fat to stay warm even during exercise?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The girl is clearly winning the race too. Clearly they have so demasculinized their population that soon there will only be the WNBA in China.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

idk, if you’re going for a run, doing it in pants seems easier and more comfortable than a skirt. never worn a skirt in public yet though so i guess i got to get back to you on that. maybe some other hexbear user can chime in with personal experience on running in both

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

If skirts are good enough for caber tossing and killing englishmen they’re good enough for running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

clearly the spiro is working because i did not have enough testosterone in my body to consider such an obvious answer

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Skorts (skirts with shorts underneath) are just as easy to run in as shorts or pants, in my experience, because they’ll usually have pockets or stitching to keep the skirt part in place. Skirts suck for active wear imo, cuz they usually flap up against your torso when you run if they’re short, or tangle around your legs when longer. Can’t speak for old timey kilts and whatnot. Pants with pockets will always be my go to. I fully support skirts as fashion wear for everyone though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Generally less fabric covering your body makes running easier, skirts are fine to run in as long as they’re not tight & restrict your thighs

permalink
report
parent
reply

How exactly do they interpret a COVER of a book like that? Pure culture war brainworms all the way down

permalink
report
reply
32 points

It’s a matter of time before that Grummz idiot outs himself as a pedo by complaining that an underaged girl isn’t sexy enough because of the wokes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Why woman have pants now???

permalink
report
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments