You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
13 points
*

I’ve seen projects that count the confirmed KIA by name from social media commemorations,. and they arrive at like Russian 72k KIA, 68k Ukranian KIA. Russia does not have a 10:1 casualty rate.

Edit: I don’t know why we shouldn’t accept the named KIA projects as being an effective lower-bound estimate of those killed. if we accept around 70,000 Russians have died, and assume that there are significantly more russian non-KIA casualties than KIA, then not even the Russian MOD is claiming numbers that would be 10:1. Does the Slava Rossiya crew on Hexbear think there are over 2 million Ukranian casualties? in Febuary, Russia said 444,000 Ukranians killed and wounded.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

They do. They have air superiority and really much more of everything including morale

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

We also know:

  1. Ukraine has been getting slowly pushed back
  2. Ukraine’s counteroffensive failed

Abandoning a position because you can’t hold it usually involves lots of deaths. Similarly, moving on a position but getting pushed back seems like it would aldo be pretty costly.

I’m skeptical of 10:1, but I’m also skeptical of 1:1.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

They have air superiority and are fighting an army that’s obsessed with launching hopeless offensives and been reduced to forcibly conscripting 50 years olds, I would totally believe a 10:1 ratio

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Russia absolutely has a 10:1 kill ratio and you’d be stupid to not believe it.

permalink
report
parent
reply