In short: By the time a person is 18, they must effectively be able to communicate and understand conversationally in 2 languages and casually use them in daily life…, if not become completely fluent…

Other than that, any language goes (whether it is a locally-known one, or a popular one worldwide),

The only thing I hope to gain from this, is to rid the world of /Monolingual Betas/

Seriously though, has this been a policy before? Because I haven’t heard of such one…

I think this can especially be used for citizenship…

Edit: I don’t necessarily have any other presupposed requirements besides bilingualism, though we may have certain notions of such in this main goal

Edit II: In furthering this venture, I have realized that my liberalism may slightly poisoned my lens…

And for clarification…

Minimum dual language system:

Main national language + other language (likely another related language, but foreign ones are fine)

52 points

Counterpoint: Like 80% of bilinguals in Latin America (myself included) have American culture brainrot as a result of being able to go on anglo internet.

Synthesis: Mandatory bilingual policy, the English language is officially forbidden.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Mandatory bilingual policy, the English language is officially forbidden.

permalink
report
parent
reply

But if you can understand the enemy, you can understand how to get into its beating heart…

That being said, it’s not necessarily a bilingual problem than a Western cultural one, eh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Agreed.

Wait, nevermind I thought that said bisexual.

permalink
report
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply

i think you should HAVE to learn sign language.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

It would be so handy to communicate with someone from the other side of a window or something too

I expect everyone would develop a habit of signing some things while talking, to emphasize a point or provide context.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ogey then… which sign language? American?

permalink
report
parent
reply

they should learn their respective countries. I assume dialects like Black American Sign Language would be preserved through social learning. although a universal sign language could be cool. i think we should learn sign language because deaf people cant learn how to hear.

permalink
report
parent
reply

And where does this slope end? We all have to learn how to speak to neurodivergent people in an inclusive way because neurotipical communication can lead to misunderstanding???

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why? I’m thinking in terms of what I would use as a language in my every day in the United States and there are so many languages I hear more often per day than see people signing

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

In the post-atomic horror of the near future you will need sign language to signal your comrades while you engage in urban stealth combat against the techno-barbarians of the rad wastes

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

To communicate with deaf or hard of hearing people, to communicate with someone when you both can’t hear eachother, to commicate with infants, to committed with non verbal people, etc but just communicating with disabled people should be a good enough reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But why this over a language with more monolingual/ non-dominant language speakers within the country? You can’t communicate with them either unless you know their language

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I feel like this would just end with kids in poor school districts not being able to become citizens

Actually you might be able to get white support for that lmfao

permalink
report
reply

They don’t have to speak perfectly in a language, they just have to communicate well and use it in daily life…

Note: Besides, what are these white people going to speak as a second language? Scots?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Canada already has the results of your thought experiment though, outside of people who work in Quebec tourist towns the only ones who can communicate well in both languages either went to private school or an immersion program. The latter are very much similar to gifted programs in that they are very much designed as a way to get additional public funds to affluent people who can’t quite afford private school tuition.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Well, I guess that answers my question…

Edit: But I think its more of a socio-economic systemic problem than a policy one, in regards to bilingual policy…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I wish, I feel so inadequate being an American who only knows one language comparing myself to…Almost every other country in the world lol. If I ever have a kid I would insist that they start school taking language immersion classes if it were available

permalink
report
reply

Something something, I remembered a Latino joke how if a “Multilingual” refers to someone who speaks 3 or more languages, then “American” refers to someone who can only speak one…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Man, us Americans get owned so hard by people in other countries when it comes to roasting. I’ve heard that in Europe people will threaten to sue eachother as a joke on Americans lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply