26 points
*

More projection from the US. There is one country that spends by far more than any other on manipulating the global media and it’s the US, with the UK in second place. China and Russia don’t even come close.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I’ve always found it hilarious how people in the west are always worried about Russian and Chinese propaganda while they’re swimming in US propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Russian media literally ostracized and outright blocked in much of the west but somehow they waging a successful propaganda campaign, just a laughable contradiction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There’s a funny quip from Chomsky on how the west has more censorship now than USSR did back in the 70s https://scheerpost.com/2022/07/30/video-is-u-s-censorship-worse-than-soviet-russia/

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I’ve always found it hilarious how people in the west are always worried about Russian and Chinese propaganda while they’re swimming in US propaganda.

The average “nonpolitical” US citizen swims in US propaganda so much that they don’t notice it unless they see a politically skinned person in a treat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

exactly

permalink
report
parent
reply

Seriously. And yet they’ll blame racist, far-right comments on being Chinese and Russian bots sowing dissent. I do find it interesting that these two countries are the source of all right-wing propaganda while right-wingers in other countries keep waving confederate flags, screaming about the first amendment, buying into Qanon, and putting up monuments for people like Kyle Rittenhouse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Chinese diplomacy is usually extremely restrained so “empire of lies” is a pretty huge shift in tone.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Indeed, we’re seeing China taking an increasingly assertive position towards the US. It’s pretty clear that China feels confident enough that they will be able to resist whatever US throws at them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

This is the full response: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/202309/t20230930_11154141.html

Q: The US Department of State released a report on September 28, claiming that China has invested billions of dollars to spread disinformation globally. It says that China’s “global information manipulation” is not simply a matter of public diplomacy – but a challenge to the integrity of the global information space, and if unchecked, Beijing’s efforts could result in a sharp contraction of global freedom of expression in the future. What is China’s response?

A: The US Department of State report is in itself disinformation as it misrepresents facts and truth. In fact, it is the US that invented the weaponizing of the global information space. The relevant center of the US State Department which concocted the report is engaged in propaganda and infiltration in the name of “global engagement”. It is a source of disinformation and the command center of “perception warfare”. From Operation Mockingbird which bribed and manipulated news media for propaganda purposes in the Cold War era, to a vial of white powder and a staged video of the “White Helmets” cited as evidence to wage wars of aggression in Iraq and Syria earlier this century, and then to the enormous lie made up to smear China’s Xinjiang policy, facts have proven time and again that the US is an “empire of lies” through and through. Even some in the US, such as Senator Rand Paul, acknowledged that the US government is the greatest propagator of disinformation in the history of the world.

Some in the US may think that they can prevail in the information war as long as they produce enough lies. But the people of the world are not blind. No matter how the US tries to pin the label of “disinformation” on other countries, more and more people in the world have already seen through the US’s ugly attempt to perpetuate its supremacy by weaving lies into “emperor’s new clothes” and smearing others.

permalink
report
reply

Geopolitics

!geopolitics@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

The study of how factors such as geography, economics, military capability and non-State actors affects the foreign policy of states.

All articles will require a short submission statement of 3-5 sentences.

Use the article title as the submission title. Do not editorialize the title or add your own commentary to the article title.

In this community we encourage long, in-depth submissions. Submissions should not be news articles that merely provide quick updates on current events; instead they should include background information and an explanation as to why the events they describe are occurring.

Submissions should not be about an individual country’s domestic policies. Instead, they should be about relationships between different countries and/or relevant international organizations. Things like breakaway politics are permitted in this subreddit, as they are relevant to and could affect the geopolitical system.

Submissions are strongly encouraged to come from reputable sources. When posting from a lesser known source, please check whether the authors have some sort of qualification demonstrating they are knowledgeable of the subjects they discuss.

Sources that include (or solely contain) maps, statistics, or other multimedia (videos, interviews, primary sources, etc.) are permitted and even encouraged in this subreddit.

We encourage discussion and welcome anyone to pose hypotheses and ask questions. We allow self-posts.

We encourage comments to be cited.

Community stats

  • 123

    Monthly active users

  • 262

    Posts

  • 609

    Comments