Ignore the fact that RT is trying to spin this as a bad thing, bc it is obviously good

Officials in the German capital of Berlin have introduced new rules for public swimming pools and bathing facilities, allowing women to use them topless. The measure was introduced after a successful anti-discrimination complaint was hailed as a step towards creating “equal rights” for all of the city’s residents by a local anti-discrimination ombudsperson.

They had to throw in the scare quotes to show they disagreed with the woke mind virus that caused this :data-laughing:

74 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
33 points

cishet dorks stop sexualizing tits challenge (impossible)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Maybe I just dont know what “sexualize” means but I’m confused by this post. I’m queer and my entire social circle is queer and all of us are attracted to tits? We also, I assume, would all think this measure is good because people being attracted to something doesn’t mean it should be covered up. I’m also attracted to eyes but I dont think everyone should have to wear sunglasses.

idk maybe I just have poo brain here sorry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

people being attracted to something doesn’t mean it should be covered up. I’m also attracted to eyes but I dont think everyone should have to wear sunglasses.

yeah that’s what i’m getting at. i love tits as much as anybody, but at the end of the day it’s just another body part and there’s no need to make such a fuss about it. Some people get super horny over feet, yet you don’t see anybody banning sandals in public.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

I think you’ve basically got it you’re just a little mixed up with the terminology.

The sexualization of breasts here (as I understand it) means acting as if they are inherently sexual, i.e. people seeing a topless woman at the pool and throwing a fit over kids seeing it. It’s the difference between being attracted to eyes and wanting movies to be rated R for having visible eyes in them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think the point they were making is that someone just having tits out isn’t that sexually arousing for most people attracted to them. The difference between sexual and casual nudity means that a big part of attraction is presentation

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Tits are great but there’s sexual and non-sexual contexts. Like how butts can be sexual or funny depending on context.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

RT are a bunch of cranks and always have been.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

:sicko-yes: desexualization of nudity

permalink
report
reply
16 points

That’s my take on this, too. :sicko-wholesome:

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Now if they could only do something about those lascivious ladies bearing their ankles for everyone to gawk at like a common anklebird

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Ankle fetish people have been eating for too long!

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

BTW this also expressly applies to nonbinary people, not just women. I’m actually surprised the chuds left that part out.

permalink
report
reply

I think they just removed rules about anyone wearing tops in public pools

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Yes, but they explicitly mentioned that this applies both to women and enbies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Germany explicitly recognises enby as a third gender in law so it makes sense to clarify that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

omw to sell glasses with eyes popping out to deutcheperverten.

permalink
report
reply

:awooga:

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 405K

    Comments