You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
92 points

Tanks are supposed to operate in groups with close support from infantry. The iof infantry are cowards who don’t have the stomach for genocide when they have to do it in person on the ground. Thus the tank’s are unsupported, leaving them vulnerable to incredible heroics like this.

permalink
report
reply

The iof infantry are cowards who don’t have the stomach for genocide

I think it’s less that, and more that the iof is actually quite incompetent militarily because they’re actually just a colonial police force with way too much fancy gear. Can’t find it now but some guy on r/TrueAnon had a good write up about how when the US did joint operations with the iof the US officers kept getting pissed off at iof soldiers doing tactically stupid cowboy bullshit with expensive military equipment. As cowboy as the US military itself can be it seems even the iof were too much for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the iof are competent at murdering civilians indiscriminately, which is their main purpose. they are complete dogshit at counter-insurgency, their ostensible purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah, but at a certain point you’d figure high command would start worrying about how many combat ready tanks they have if politicians are gonna force them to prepare for attack on Lebanon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Agreed, but they are fascists in a perilous political situation, running an army of conscript mall cops. I think they have a lot of room for self-owns. They’ve got a significant number of religious and nationalist fanatics to appease, and a lot of those fanatics refuse to fight leading to additional internal contradictions and friction.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Speaking of self owns, a reported 49 of the IOF’s 278 casualties are from friendly fire lmao

IIRC that is actually a better ratio for them than it was earlier on

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Nobody tell them nothing

Let them think they can take it without a fight

Drain the beast with a thousand cuts

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

are cowards who don’t have the stomach for genocide

turns out this is basically anyone - the Nazis found that their initial enactment of the final solution (firing squads mostly) was hindered by the psychological impact it had on the soldiers doing it - hence why they tried to find more ‘indirect’ methods of murder, resulting in the gas chambers

permalink
report
parent
reply

This is one of my favourite little factoids about the subject, that the big hard nazis with their fascism STILL couldn’t fucking stomach doing warcrimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

There’s actually a reason for that, the Israeli tanks can’t have infantry support standing in the direction of expected fire, because their own Trophy APS (detect incoming explosives, fires what is basically explosive buckshot in the direction to trigger the explosive before it connects with the tank) will tear said infantry apart. If an RPG is fired at an Israeli tank, coming from the left side, the Trophy System will fire the explosives towards the projectile, explosion occurs, your infantry support on that side of the tank are most likely very dead. If not from catching strays from the trophy system then the prematurely detonated ordinance.

Infantry can only be stationed on sides that there cannot possibly be enemy fire. In a field, facing the enemy, you can have infantry on the sides. In an urban environment, you simply don’t deploy infantry with your tanks.

Apparently the trophy system has a reload time of 1.5 seconds, and the faster the projectile the less likely it is able to detect it and fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

in all this time we have never seen a video where an RPG triggers the trophy system

I can’t be alone in suspecting that it doesn’t work very well

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The closer the the projectile the less effective the trophy system is. A Javelin fired from 500 meters is probably going to trigger it, an RPG from 25 meters is not.

The on board computer has to detect, analyse, predict then fire countermeasures, which it may not have time to do if you pop out and 🔻🔻🔻 the tank and duck back down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

its minimum activation range is something like 50 meters or so, and most of the footage ive seen so far has seemed inside that range

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Umm … why would they design a tank which cannot have infantry support? Doesn’t that make them basically useless?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Fascists love their Vundervvaffen. We’re going to build a tank so high tech that it can’t participate in basic tank doctrine or effectively engage in urban warfare!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

In an open desert with air support, it should be fine. In an urban environment against Guerilla fighters it’s not.

But considering their main targets are ambulances and civilian cars, they’ll still roll out the tanks anyway

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Good post, I hadn’t considered that. Lol being self-owned by your own point defenses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thing is, infantry wouldn’t be walking right next to the tank if you’re expecting infantry with anti armor to be hiding in the rubble or buildings. They’d deploy first into areas with lots places that an ambush could be waiting with the tank hanging back.

If the infantry find something that needs the tank’s main gun, its called up. If the infantry gets pinned down and the rest of the infantry platoon can’t free up their pinned down squad the tank can be called forward to lay down suppressing fire if air support, artillery or mortars can’t be used.

permalink
report
parent
reply