this is vaguely related to the string theory related post from a day or two ago, it’s all bazinga science folks TL;DW string theory is a big thing because people that read pop science really liked it and it took a long time for physicists to come out in force and say “this is untestable garbage”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points
*

but the show is very explicit about how letting everyone you care about die, and then jumping into an alternate universe where you didn’t do this is traumatizing.

I’ve heard this before. Does the same “totally don’t admire this nihilistic murderous asshole, pinkie promise you won’t” message that missed so much of its loud fandom for years also apply to Roiland’s “what if Back to the Future, but Doc Brown is a pedophile lololololol” pilot for the show, or for that matter this “just kidding, just want to see how people react, this is only ironic fantasies about brutally hurting children on multiple levels” cartoon short here?

(CW: “ironic” physical and sexual abuse of children, torture, snuff)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZQbX7_Eeg4

The show doesn’t go more than an episode without reminding the viewer that everybody including Rick hates Rick for behaving like a detached asshole.

It still gives the perpetrator most of the screen time, lines, plot armor, and basic invincibility. It’s hard to really punish someone who by necessity must keep returning because the show runners say so to do more wacky edgelord hijinks next time around.

Also, the premise of the show requires that that murderous nihilism be technically justified by the plot. That’s bullshit. There’s no reason for a multiverse’s existence to necessiate the conclusion of “no one matters, exploiting and murdering people is cool and good now” outside of Roiland’s own beliefs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah, it is an exploration of the ultimate liberal paradox. What would it mean if a smart rich person was mean? To the liberal mind, it means they must be correct. Which given that he show it entertaining it is hard for liberals to understand they are wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That “exploration,” like so many others in similar and related material, seems an awful lot like “the chuds making this get off to it, and so do the hogs in the audience,” with any message of “but this is bad, don’t enjoy the spectacles of cruelty. Pinkie swear you don’t enjoy the way the entertainment made for entertainment purposes emphasizes that in cinematically gratuitous ways” used for ass covering and plausible deniability. :kombucha-disgust:

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Satire requires a clarity of purpose. Just because it fails the test doesn’t make the liberals correct. They are fundamentally unable to see a smart rich white man as deserving anything other than praise. Which is on them for being shitlibs

One episode a season is dedicated explicitly to how bad a person is and how he is the cause of his own problems. They even wrote a in show therapist to tell him this to his face and they multiple times show that she is correct. If that is not enough for the libs, then I am afraid they are simply libs.

We have to deal with the fact that being evil and doing rad evil shit is fun. That is our lot as fun hating comunists.

permalink
report
parent
reply