On this day in 1983, a patent was granted to MIT for a new cryptographic algorithm: RSA. “RSA” stands for the names of its creators Rivest, Shamir, and Adlemen. RSA is a “public-key” cryptosystem. Prior to the creation of RSA, public-key cryptography was not in wide use.

Public-key cryptography

Cryptography is the study and practice of secure communication. Throughout most of its historical use, cryptographic techniques were entirely dependent on the involved parties already sharing a secret that could be used to reverse an encryption process. In early cryptography, the secret was itself the encryption process (for example, a Caesar cipher that substitutes letters in a secret message with letters a fixed number of steps down the alphabet). As cryptography became more systematic and widespread in use, it became necessary to separate cryptographic secrets from the cryptographic techniques themselves because the techniques could become known by the enemy (as well as static cryptographic schemes being more vulnerable to cryptanalysis). Regardless, there is still the issue of needing to share secrets between the communicating parties securely. This has taken many forms over the years, from word of mouth to systems of secure distribution of codebooks. But this kind of cryptography always requires an initial secure channel of communication to exchange secrets before an insecure channel can be made secure by the use of cryptography. And there is the risk of an enemy capturing keys and making the entire system worthless.

Only relatively recently has this fundamental problem been addressed in the form of public-key cryptography. In the late 20th century, it was proposed that a form of cryptography could exist where the 2 parties, seeking to communicate securely, could exchange some non-secret information (a “public” key) derived from privately held secret information (a “private” key), and use a mathematical function (a “trap-door” function) that is easy to compute in one direction (encryption) but hard to reverse without special information (decryption) to encipher messages to each other, using each other’s respective public keys, that can’t be easily decrypted without the corresponding private key. In other words, it should be easy to encipher messages to each other using a public key but hard to decrypt messages without the related private key. At the time this idea was proposed there was no known computationally-hard trap-door function that could make this possible in practice. Shortly after, several candidates and cryptosystems based upon them were described publicly 👁, including one that is still with us today…

RSA

Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard Adleman at MIT had made many attempts to find a suitably secure trap-door function for creating a public-key cryptosystem over a year leading up to the publication of their famous paper in 1978. Rivest and Shamir, the computer scientists of the group, would create a candidate trap-door function while Adleman, the mathematician, would try to find a way to easily reverse the function without any other information (like a public key). Supposedly, it took them 42 attempts before they created a promising new trap-door function.

As described in their 1978 paper “A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems”, RSA is based upon the principle that factoring very large numbers is computationally difficult (for now!). The paper is a great read, if you’re interested in these topics. The impact of RSA can’t be overstated. The security of communications on the internet have been dependent on RSA and other public-key cryptosystems since the very beginning. If you check your browser’s connection info right now, you’ll see that the cryptographic signature attached to Hexbear’s certificate is based on RSA! In the past, even the exchange of symmetric cipher keys between your web browser and the web server would have been conducted with RSA but there has been a move away from that to ensure the compromise of either side’s RSA private keys would not compromise all communications that ever happened.

The future of RSA?

In 1994, a mathematician named Peter Shor, developed an algorithm for quantum computers that would be capable of factoring the large integers used in the RSA scheme. In spite of this, RSA has seen widespead and increasing use in securing communications on the internet. Until recently, the creation of a large enough quantum computer to run Shor’s algorithm at sufficient scale was seen as very far off. With advances in practical quantum computers though, RSA is on its way out. Although current quantum computers are still a very long way off from being able to break RSA, it’s looking more and more plausable that someone could eventually build one that is capable of cracking RSA. A competition being held by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, similar to the one that selected the Advanced Encryption Algorithm, is already underway to select standard cryptographic algorithms that can survive attacks from quantum computers.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

New Megathread Nerds!!!

It’s my first megathread, I hope you like it! I am somewhat nervous about posting it lol

@aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net @Abraxiel@hexbear.net @Abstraction@hexbear.net @Acute_Engles@hexbear.net @AnarchaPrincess@hexbear.net @AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net @Alaskaball@hexbear.net @AlicePraxis@hexbear.net @Aliveelectricwire@hexbear.net @artificialset@hexbear.net @asa_red_heathen@hexbear.net @autismdragon@hexbear.net @Awoo@hexbear.net @bbnh69420@hexbear.net @BirdBrained@hexbear.net @buh@hexbear.net @CDommunist@hexbear.net @Cherufe@hexbear.net @ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net @clover@hexbear.net @Comp4@hexbear.net @ComradeCmdrPiggy@hexbear.net @ComradeEchidna@hexbear.net @context@hexbear.net @corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net @CrispyFern@hexbear.net @CriticalOtaku@hexbear.net @Cromalin@hexbear.net @CyborgMarx@hexbear.net @Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net @Dolores@hexbear.net @drinkinglakewater@hexbear.net @Dryad@hexbear.net @ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net @ElGosso@hexbear.net @el_principito@hexbear.net @EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net @FALGSConaut@hexbear.net @Flinch@hexbear.net @forcequit@hexbear.net @Frank@hexbear.net @Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net @FuckyWucky@hexbear.net @GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net @Goadstool@hexbear.net @GorbinOutOverHere@hexbear.net @Grownbravy@hexbear.net @GVAGUY3@hexbear.net @HarryLime@hexbear.net @hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net @Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net @Hooray4dolphins@hexbear.net @InevitableSwing@hexbear.net @iridaniotter@hexbear.net @jabrd@hexbear.net @JamesConeZone@hexbear.net @Kaputnik@hexbear.net @kristina@hexbear.net @LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net @Magician@hexbear.net @MaxOS@hexbear.net @Melina@hexbear.net @Mindfury@hexbear.net @mkultrawide@hexbear.net @Nagarjuna@hexbear.net @Nakoichi@hexbear.net @PaulSmackage@hexbear.net @plinky@hexbear.net @Pluto@hexbear.net @PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net @President_Obama@hexbear.net @Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net @Redcuban1959@hexbear.net @RION@hexbear.net @RNAi@hexbear.net @Rojo27@hexbear.net @SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net @solaranus@hexbear.net @SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net @Sickos@hexbear.net @silent_water@hexbear.net @Sphere@hexbear.net @spring_rabbit@hexbear.net @SunsetFruitbat@hexbear.net @take_five_seconds@hexbear.net @Teekeeus@hexbear.net @Tervell@hexbear.net @UlyssesT@hexbear.net @VHS@hexbear.net @viva_la_juche@hexbear.net @WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net @Wheaties@hexbear.net @WhyEssEff@hexbear.net @WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net @wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net @wombat@hexbear.net @Zoift@hexbear.net @Zuzak@hexbear.net

@thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net @WhoaSlowDownMaurice@hexbear.net @Quimby@hexbear.net

@CARCOSA@hexbear.net @liberal@hexbear.net @ella@hexbear.net @all_or_nothing@hexbear.net @KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net @KiraNerys@hexbear.net @TomboyShulk@hexbear.net @DuckNuckem@hexbear.net @SapGreen@hexbear.net @Zangief@hexbear.net @scumlord@hexbear.net @COMMENT@hexbear.net @Antisocial_Socialist@hexbear.net @DOPESMOKERDENG@hexbear.net @BoarAvoir@hexbear.net

Remember nerds just like in the old site, no current struggle session discussion here on the new general megathread, i will ban you from the comm and remove your comment, have a good day/night :meow-coffee:

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Early mega hits different

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Good thread friend!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

New mega, hell yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

ok i pull up

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply

Happy first mega!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Howdy

permalink
report
parent
reply

Great topic, I’m a dev and knew some of this but still learned some stuff. Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

True crime fans say the dumbest shit when they get invested in a case and start assigning morality to literally just observational positions.

“Oh how can you say this might create doubt for a jury when you havent seen all of the evidence? How can you possibly say that?”

Literally how are you into true crime if you suddenly start having issues with speculation based on incomplete information?

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

True crime “fans” and content creators are typically very disrespectful to the cases and victims. Like why are you doing asmr or doing your makeup or making jokes while talking about a little girl being murdered?

And the racism and ableism is so disgusting. If the victim is a poc and the perpetrator is white, they’re so much more likely to write it off as a suicide or freak accident. Any “weird” body language is a clear sign someone is a “sociopath” or “psychopath” when they’re just picking apart someone’s every move

Don’t get me started on the bootlicking for forensics

permalink
report
parent
reply

True crime communities become unhinged so quick. They get emotionally invested, posting about how sad they are, or vengeance posting about how the perpetrator should be SA’ed in prison. They start developing parasocial relationships with the people involved, posting memorial collages, etc. They overanalyze every new detail and draw connections between everything.

I used to enjoy following the Jeremy Dewitte case, the serial police impersonator who videotaped himself pretending to be a cop for years. It was fun, but the communities following the case went so hard into analyzing every little detail that they became convinced that everything was a conspiracy. A bunch of “influencers” started making channels pretending to have inside information, claiming to have sources inside the police or personally knowing cops involved in the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Since I know everyone here is very invested in my love life, got my first phone number from having the corgi with me on Sunday. Got a date on friday! They’re a special ed teacher (is there a better word for that? please tell me if so) that plays a lot of DnD. Pretty stoked! Promising job interview lined up for next week, and doing mutual aid work (food rescue and distro) over the weekend.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Special ed. teacher is always what my dad called his job, he is pretty old though. People that exclusively work as classroom assistants sometimes go by parapro.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

My dog got that newly unleashed rizz something fierce.

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply

My wife used to be friends in high school with this couple that ended up being super reactionary. The dude ended up getting testosterone because he couldn’t get abs. He’s ostensibly opposed to gender affirming care unless he’s trying to be hotter. I thought this shit was hard to get? Just not for lunatics?

permalink
report
reply

It might be hard to get from a doctor, but go to any more “serious” gym and you can probably find a T hookup

permalink
report
parent
reply

Abs are genetic and you have to have like 0% body fat to see them anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He’s ostensibly opposed to gender affirming care unless he’s trying to be hotter.

A genuinely good bit nice one

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

depends on if he’s getting it legitimately or not ig, but T definitely has secondary markets

permalink
report
parent
reply

technology

!technology@hexbear.net

Create post

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

  • 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
  • 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
  • 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
  • 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
  • 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
  • 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
  • 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 60K

    Comments