The tax applies only to individuals with at least $100 million in wealth and mostly affects hedge fund managers.

t_d thread: https://archive.is/5pFXr

here’s fox news trying to convince people that the tax will mean that if your home goes up in value, the government will take your house: https://archive.is/Ay89M

“This would be the most crazy tax structure we have ever seen. It makes Venezuela look normal. It makes Russia look normal,” Gingrich stressed. “That speech last week in Raleigh, where [Harris] outlined her economic plan, that was crazy. That was so far to the left of Bernie Sanders that Gorbachev in Russia would have thought it was a radical speech.”

6 points

nobody’s willing to work anymore, the just want to take handouts

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Yeah I’m like 175% sure that they’d be able write off drops in the value of the stock.

My concern with this idea is, how exactly are they calculating the value each year? Average value over the calendar year, value at end of CY, value at YTD from the original purchase? If done wrong it could lead to gaming of the market such that when it’s time to calculate the value, the market always happens to be in a dip then, very odd.

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

Yeah I’m like 175% sure that they’d be able write off drops in the value of the stock.

Yeah, the “taxes on gains that no longer exist” argument, betrays their basic lack of understanding about how taxes on assets work. Do they just not understand that capital losses offset the tax burden of the gains?

I wonder if some of this confusion happens because most people don’t have exposure to anything beyond income and property taxes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s exactly what it is. Everyone that complains about this has only ever had to deal with a W2 or 1099 form. They don’t understand that as you get richer, you have so many different avenues to avoid paying taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yep, it’s also why the politicians and their idiotic “balance the government spending like a household budget” talk has traction. Most people don’t understand how this stuff works at the higher echelons. This stuff goes way beyond what “kitchen table economics” can parse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If I were president it would be calculated second by second but without correctiing by the fraction that second represents of the year (1/60x60x24x365) in order to tax them an astronomic sum

permalink
report
parent
reply

And def doable with the tech we have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The other question would be which stocks would be included in a scheme, because stocks with low liquidity would be even simpler to game to rack up unrealised tax losses

permalink
report
parent
reply

it’s all moot, this ain’t passing. if it actually made it to her desk she just wouldn’t sign it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I saw someone posting something similar about this and a person replied “you don’t make enough money to be concerned about this” and they were like “you don’t know what I’m cooking! I’m certain I’ll be in this tax bracket by the next sitting president!” Lol

permalink
report
reply
17 points

That’s been a conservative talking point for years. That if it weren’t for [insert generic bad person here] you’d have a million dollars and a boat and 6 houses.

I’m amazed how many people still fall into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m amazed how many people still fall into it.

they have to believe it, or that means capitalism doesn’t work, and that is a train of thought they have refused to follow

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

This worked when they made everyone afraid of the estate tax, even though that only applies to the richest 2,000 or so deaths a year.

permalink
report
reply

“But what if that’s me??”

-person that buried their credit and nearly bankrupted themselves to buy a lifted F250 Platinum and a Cybertruck

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Gorbachev in Russia would have thought it was a radical speech.

  1. he spent most of his last decades in Germany iirc
  2. he was a liberal
  3. he’s dead
permalink
report
reply
  1. he’s dead

Not to Newt Gingrich, he’s not. Rent-free afterlife.

These people are fighting a late-80’s Cold War with a non-existent adversary.

permalink
report
parent
reply

they’re doing everything in their power to revive it tho lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 61

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 427K

    Comments