20 points

it’s just asia. europe’s just a subregion in the northwest of asia.

permalink
report
reply

Europe and India are Asian subcontinents. The only reason Europe is considered a full continent is white people made the definitions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

they made the definitions before they’d invented white people though. IIRC this nomenclature comes from the ancient greeks. it’s very ancient european cope.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the names and boundaries of continents are arbitrary and don’t matter. that said, the most common definition, really more of a vibe, of a continent is size. Europe is 3 times larger than India. It’s twice as large as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and Afghanistan combined.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Bold move including Russia as part of Europe considering how the europeans have been acting (without western russia europe is 2x the size of India).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I was under the impression that continent boundaries were defined by tectonic plates. Is that not correct?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The European subcontinent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Obligatory Map Men: https://youtu.be/hrsxRJdwfM0

Afroeurasia is a continent. The only thing separating Africa from Asia is the Suez canal which is manmade.

Same goes for the Americas - the Panama canal is manmade.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Pangaea is the only continent!

permalink
report
parent
reply

west asian peninsula

permalink
report
reply

wet ass peninsula

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s a bit offensive to associate Asia, such a wonderful continent with those barbaric savages in its western peninsula.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

While we’re at it, we may as well make it 4 continents: Afro-Eurasia, the Americas, Australia, and Antarctica. I think there’s even an argument for combining Afro-Eurasia and the Americas too, since it’s just one big contiguous landmass during ice ages. This has important biological consequences for the historic exchange of humans and other animals via Beringia. It also makes it easier to understand the close linguistic and genetic relationships between Siberian peoples and Native Americans. I hope you have enjoyed this argument for why a 3 continent world mental model is good, actually

permalink
report
reply

Why stop there? After we rule 85% of the world’s land area to belong to just one continent, why split the remaining 15% of Earth’s land in two? That seems awfully imbalanced to me. So I rule that we should just merge Oceania and Antarctica together into the great continent of “Antherest” — after all, the Maori were quite likely the first people to discover Antarctica; Antarctica itself is just an archipelago with the appearance of a contiguous landmass due to its ice (which might not last); and there aren’t really any people on Antarctica to object to being merged with Oceania.

permalink
report
parent
reply