Why stop there? After we rule 85% of the world’s land area to belong to just one continent, why split the remaining 15% of Earth’s land in two? That seems awfully imbalanced to me. So I rule that we should just merge Oceania and Antarctica together into the great continent of “Antherest” — after all, the Maori were quite likely the first people to discover Antarctica; Antarctica itself is just an archipelago with the appearance of a contiguous landmass due to its ice (which might not last); and there aren’t really any people on Antarctica to object to being merged with Oceania.
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 14 points
Deleted by creator
chapotraphouse
!chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don’t post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
Community stats
2.8K
Monthly active users
42K
Posts
488K
Comments
Community moderators
- LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
- MiraculousMM [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
- KenBonesWildRide [they/them]@hexbear.net
- Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
- itsPina [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
- corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
- PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
- ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
- EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net