I imagine the free speech people will be livid about this

permalink
report
reply

Or how about these hogs going off spouting Orwell when they’re the ones doing the thought police shit and policing language.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s absolutely Orwellian that you want police with accountability for there actions!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

“Wait, not like this”

  • Eric Arthur Blair, a colonial cop
permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Also wonder what the anti-woke word for child bride is given that WV is one of the few states that aggressively permits that shit. Junior woman of married status? Provisional adult? 🤔

permalink
report
reply
19 points

“his property”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

?? WV is shitty for a lot of reasons, including this bill (seriously, there are more important things to deal with than being upset someone called it “chestfeeding” instead of “breastfeeding”).

But marriage in WV is 18+, 16+ if the person and their parents both sign paperwork to approve, and their spouse is no more than 4 years older than them. I wouldn’t call that aggressively permitting child brides, not compared to say California which technically has no hard minimum age of marriage unless they’ve changed the law in the last few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

WV conservatives seem to be very pro child marriage. Pretty weird if you ask me.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3894344-west-virginia-senators-reject-bill-to-ban-child-marriage/

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s always a red flag when someone has intimate knowledge of child marriage laws and comes out the gate swinging to defend them

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

18, 16 with parental consent is pretty typical in the US. Like a majority of states.

There are only ten that have no under 18 marriage under any circumstances, most work basically the same as WV, two actually require you to be older than 18, and California has no hard minimum. Massachusetts is one of the states with a hard limit of 18, but that was only passed in 2022, before that Massachusetts had no hard minimum same as California.

As for being weirdly familiar with these laws, five minutes with Google can get you there.

The whole point is it’s dumb to pick on WV for having essentially the same rules as a majority of states as opposed to the 20% who don’t consider parental or judicial approval good enough for an exception, the two who don’t consider 18 old enough or the one with no minimum.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Literally all the terms have to do with pregnancy, breastfeeding, or menstruation. Like “birth-giver” is banned and the replacement word is “woman.”

Also it’s very odd seeing official government documents refer to words as woke, as if it has a standard agreed upon definition. The bill goes on to specify that the banned terms are sexist and exclusionary (lmao republicans worried about being sexist in a state that completely bans abortion). I can’t stop thinking about how that one DeSantis admin person had to define wokeness to a federal judge and the best they could come up with is “a belief that society is unfair and that it should change.”

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What is more feminist than stopping the murder of future women (babies)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Wtf they literally just destroyed their flagship university, one of the few things they still had going for them. Do they want more brain drain? Because it’s already been happening for a while. Pretty soon there won’t be any people left.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yeah but did you see how owned the left is

permalink
report
parent
reply

Do they want more brain drain?

yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do they want more brain drain?

There is a theory that they do indeed want a brain drain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments