This person has also said many transphobic and misogynistic things to me before. Lemmy.ml is a fucking joke, I’m only on here to check trans places everywhere
https://lemmy.ml/post/17190483/11831213
edit: He’s been banned by dessalines. But nutomic (an admin) and davel (an admin and hexbear user) has been defending him in the comments. They should go too, wtf
How tf after reading what happened do you come to the conclusion this is a conversation about laws? Other people on the post were discussing laws, Joker said shit like:
“Are drawings real? Says a lot about you, who would rather the liberty of masses be stomped and murdered rather than drawings exist.”
"The problem with claiming AI generated art as CSAM is that there is no possible way to create an objective definition of what “level” of realism is real and what is not. A drawing or imaginary creation is best left not defined as real in any capacity whatsoever. "
And then they made comments trying to say that it would somehow be impossible to differentiate medical photos from CSAM? Just a lot of really transparently weird stuff. That’s more than just a difference in laws, he obviously doesn’t think its wrong from a child porn standpoint.
He’s technically right that it would be hard to legislate consistently and there would be weird grey zones in doing so but when it comes to deepfakes of actual flesh and blood children which is what is being described here, this falls squarely into the not-at-all-grey area lmao. Its just pointless to bring that up. Laws being hard to enforce correctly isnt a reason to not have them inherently. Because there are things that should very obviously be off limits no matter what and deepfakes of actual flesh and blood children should obviously fall in that category.
Like I don’t even know that this dude is an acutal pedophile lmao my read here is that he’s a weird as fuck pendant that choses incredibly strange hills to die on and isn’t even right in applying the arguments he’s trying to apply. Baffling. Like he doesn’t even think this should be legal? He just thinks it should be illegal for a different reason? Except thats not even correct because the “defemation and libel” he cites IS ITSELF ABUSE OF A CHILD like god just thinking about how absurd these arguments are is blowing my brain away .
Like I don’t even know that this dude is an acutal pedophile lmao my read here is that he’s a weird as fuck pendant that choses incredibly strange hills to die on and isn’t even right in applying the arguments he’s trying to apply.
Yeah this is what trips me up about these kinds of discussions, curiously a similar thing happens when zoophilia is mentioned. Nobody will of course publicly support child porn or zoophilia but somehow there’s always people willing to hem and haw about it endlessly when this kind of topic arises. Like I dunno dude for somebody that doesn’t at all condone this you sure love thinking about it.
