In your option on a scale of 1 to 10 - how badly did the Secret Service screw up?

I’m not a gun guy and I’ve been lazy (I only read the very short article) but to me it seems like a 10/10 “What the fuck were they thinking?” screw up.

Sniper shot at former President Donald Trump from 130 yards away on roof of manufacturing plant

130 yards? That’s it? From a prone position on a rooftop in perfect weather. What was the shooter crosseyed? God damn.

The SS certainly fucked up though. They have unlimited resources and couldn’t even bother to have a guy sit up there any twiddle his thumbs. The roof of a building with a perfect vantage from which to fuck up perhaps the world’s easiest shot apparently.

permalink
report
reply

What was the shooter crosseyed?

USA TODAY NETWORK…

The assailant reportedly used an AR-15.

How accurate is an AR-15 at that distance?

-–

Edit

My wild hunch is that it actually wasn’t an AR-15. In the rush to get a scoop - information was garbled and then it was media copypasta city.

permalink
report
parent
reply

An AR-15 would be perfectly fine at 130 yards. Without even any fancy optics or scopes or anything, just iron sights.

To your other points, the shooter didn’t fire many rounds, I’m going to guess the rifle was an SKS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If the gun is set up right the it’ll pretty much hit the exact same spot every time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Information wasn’t garbled, it’s the media war on guns, with the AR pattern rifle being used as a scape goat.

“See, see, even your precious Trump was assasinated with your beloved AR15!” Media asshats would love to print that.

Nevermind they have no idea what an AR15 is, nor semi-auto, auto, machine gun, etc.

And yet here we have a crazy, non-conservative attempting to assassinate a president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Any rifle at that distance is sufficiently accurate for anyone with a little training.

That’s like level 1 rifle distance.

A carbine is accurate at that distance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’d think the protocol would be to have spotters looking for such things, with just a couple strategically placed riflemen ready to take out someone like that, once spotted.

That would be my approach, after Kennedy.

Yes, they first protect the target, but why not both? A professional marksman wouldn’t likely miss someone like this amateur.

permalink
report
parent
reply

9? I mean he got shot at.

tbh, I think every aspect of the state is falling apart. Blame it on covid, blame it on privatization, blame it on morale. I think the wheels are coming off and it’s showing everywhere. The government is filled with brain damaged fail children, and it shows.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Blame it on corruption, plain as day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

15/10

idk how the fuck this happened.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

I do.

They couldn’t be bothered to do the basics.

permalink
report
parent
reply

11/10 fuck up

permalink
report
reply
2 points

7-8

permalink
report
reply

guns

!guns@hexbear.net

Create post

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

    1. NO BUYING, SELLING OR TRADING of guns or accessories. Take that to Reddit and /r/GunAccessoriesForSale or Armslist.com
    1. Censor all personally identifiable information in posts including serial numbers on firearms.
    1. Any post or comment advocating illegal action will be removed and the poster warned. A second infraction will result in a ban.
    1. Unironically suggesting the SKS as a usable rifle in the 21st Century when there are things like the AK and AR that cost only a bit more might result in a ban, it depends on how we feel.
    1. Discussion of hunting is acceptable but please put “CW: hunting” in post titles. Debating the ethicality of hunting is also fine, but keep it civil and don’t derail other people’s threads.

Community stats

  • 259

    Monthly active users

  • 4.5K

    Posts

  • 6.7K

    Comments