He’s guaranteed to lose now. I can’t see a universe where the mental gymnastics add up to deciding that this is a good idea. Don’t get me wrong, it’d be funny as hell. But I’m really not looking forward to the idea of more Trump.

9 points

It was a debate

permalink
report
reply
16 points

The problem is they cannot replace Biden, there is simply way too much Democratic money interests tied to the Biden administration.

Ukraine is like Bitcoin - Biden has managed to pour huge amount of money onto that front and got everyone to buy into it, expecting the line to go up and up and up. Nobody wants to be left holding the bag, and that’s the same logic as people holding on to Bitcoin and refusing to sell. Better that everyone goes down together than to be the one making a loss. Sunk cost fallacy.

Having said that, Biden is still not completely cooked yet. There are 5 months left, and “interesting” things can happen that would be so shocking that the polls could still be flipped.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

It seems like the only people who can get access to him are a clique of his immediate family and long time advisors. There doesn’t seem to be an actual political party in the conventional sense. We’re dealing with weird dynastic politics and power cliques.

So, it sounds like it’s not so much “they”, the dnc, are going to run him again, as that Jill and Hunter are going to run him again, and the rest of us can hang if it means Hunter gets some pardons or whatever it is they believe they’re doing.

It’s all fucked, there’s nothing resembling a democratic process or even an organization behind this.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

When are we going to decide on a Gang of Four style name for it, or are we just gonna call it the Biden Clique

permalink
report
parent
reply

Super Biden Bros

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The Jill Joint?

Hunter’s Heros?

The Ukraine Connection?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

There doesn’t seem to be an actual political party in the conventional sense.

This seems like it has larger ramifications

permalink
report
parent
reply

we can’t worry about that right now, maybe when there’s not a freakin Cheeto who’s going to destroy all of democracy! Then we can maybe talk about the late Holy Roman Empire dynasty holding onto power (but if you try and talk about it we’ll scold you as a Russian shill)

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’ve been chewing on it for a while now. I don’t think the Democrats are a political party. The GOP is. As much as they’re weird mutants, they do have rigid party discipline, clear goals, and long-term strategies that have been extremely effective in realizing those goals. The fabled “Demographic shift” that was supposed to save the Democrats seems like fantasy now; The GOP has seized control of critical organs of government, entrenched itself to protect against electoral upsets, and can more or less rule by fiat via the SCOTUS.

Meanwhile the democrats have none of that. They’re a squabbling band of also-rans who couldn’t hack it in the GOP, lead by the coldest, most bloodless monsters on the planet. I think most Democrats are losers who had the narcissistic self-aggrandizement to be politicians, but lacked the courage or gumption to try to make it in the nazi-breeding alchemical furnace of the GOP. The Democrats are where these losers end up, pursuing safer, less taxing madness in the Democratic party. There are a few genuine moralists in there, too, who are misguided or fanatical enough to believe in the propaganda version of liberalism.

But as we can observe - There’s little meaningful difference between the parties. The GOP are just democrats who are honest about what America is and proud of it, while the Democrats lie to the public and possibly to themselves about their goals and desires.

And when you’ve got a “party” of cowards who can’t admit to themselves what they really are, and feel the need to make a superficial play of resistance to the GOP, you don’t have much to align on. So most of them are craven opportunists, you end up with New York and California where all the scum who would be GOP are Dems because that’s how they can access wealth and power. Their leadership are all Nazi liches of untold decrepitude and malice, so the Dems who actually believe in anything have no chance of pushing their agendas through. They’re all absolute slaves to capital. The party is just so shot through with contradictions that it can’t possibly advance any cohesive plan or enforce party discipline. They couldn’t even deal with Joe Manchin, whether he was the designated Judas Goat or not.

You can see it in the leadership - Obama wouldn’t codify Roe, Hilldawg ran with an anti-abortion VP, Pelosi stated there was room in the Dems for anti-abortion freaks, and Biden has been opposed to abortion his whole career and let Roe die without even token resistance. Meanwhile Abortion has been their most unifying propaganda asset for decades. It’s all a sham.

So you’ve got a couple of cliques of warlords - Obama, the Clintons, Pelosi, the Bidens, and whoever else isn’t too senile to function, trying to keep a lid on things while their minions jockey for access and power. Then you’ve got the vast swamp of absolute losers who think Sieg Heiling is tacky. And mixed in there are a couple of dorks who actually believe in something that isn’t just pure, nihilistic evil, even if they are still capitalists.

permalink
report
parent
reply

good post

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Joe Biden should drop out but I understand why they aren’t replacing him. The Democrats are the most risk adverse political party possible. The question isn’t should he drop out but who replaces him. Pick the wrong person and you risk alienating key parts of your base. Do they even beat Trump? I think there’s a correct candidate who meets all the parameters to win this year but the democrats are cowards and aren’t willing to take the risk.

plus they have the copium of “he won last time.”

permalink
report
reply
73 points
29 points

fed the democracy the doodoo

permalink
report
parent
reply

This is what I was holding to for a long time but then watching them all panic this week made me question it

Like, I thought you all knew! I thought you knew he was a vegetable and was going to lose and were just fine with that because you want to lose. But if that was the plan why freak out now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because freaking out publicly in the media is part of making sure they lose, maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply

chat

!chat@hexbear.net

Create post

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 56K

    Comments