32 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

When even StonksGPT knows it’s a bubble

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Yes, let AI handle stock trading, this is a great idea and definitely doesn’t have potential to collapse the global economy

Unrelated emoji:

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Isn’t most trading done via machine these days? I think these guys just ignored proven technology and used some ChatGPT api to “power” their ETF lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

it says it’s using a quantitative model like all the other trading bots, not chatgpt. people were using machine learning models for trading long before gpt 4 but since the “AI” boom now everything has to be labelled AI or AI-powered.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I remember helping a friend wrote one in R and Python like 10+ years ago when we were in highschool to predict the MISO energy market.

Some dude paid us like $3000 to make one for him because he wanted to buy a $10k solar farm in Oklahoma so he could speculate on grid futures…

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

is the nasdaq 100 entirely dependent on nvidia?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I would say Nvidia is entirely dependent on OpenAI.

permalink
report
parent
reply

it’s having an outsized effect, i think. might be interesting if the machine learning algorithm is picking up that it’s overvalued or whatever else and that’s why it’s excluded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I wonder if it’s just 'cus Nvidia isn’t being talked about much. “AI” is the buzzword, the There’s Gold in Them Thar Hills of this bubble. Hardware is the picks and shovels, where the real cash is being made. If they’re just training this on scrapping text from the web, that’s an easy fact to overlook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So a bit like how thematic ETFs are usually not a good investment, because they follow the hype and jump on the bandwagon at a point in time where prices have already run up?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In recent times? Probably to some degree, but not completely.

But I would argue that with stocks it isnt unusual for a small percentage to be the majority driver of gains. Even in smaller funds like the nasdaq100. This certainly holds true over the larger market see e.g. here.

I am sure there was a time where your sentence would have been equally true if you replace Nvidia with Tesla, Apple, Microsoft, Google and so on. At any one time it might depend on only one or a few companies, but those stocks will change and aren’t set in stone forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

technology

!technology@hexbear.net

Create post

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

  • 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
  • 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
  • 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
  • 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
  • 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
  • 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
  • 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.9K

    Posts

  • 59K

    Comments