RIP @InevitableSwing

Keep your eye on the ball, people. If the dems literally never lose another election they should take the court back by 2050 and then start reversing all the terrible rulings that will happen in the next 25 years. I mean they won’t actually do that last part because they’ll treat those rulings as precedent, bricks in the great edifice of the american project we are all working together to build etc., but anyway I lost my train of thought

this ruling is a travesty, it should have been 9 liberal justices unanimously voting le evil dorito mussolini back onto the ballot

if we vote hard enough we can accomplish this

I mean they won’t actually do that last part because they’ll treat those rulings as precedent, bricks in the great edifice of the american project we are all working together to build

there has never been a more true statement

Uh, oh. What was the vote? Do I want to know?

-–

Edit

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh! A sharp concurrence!

It was unanimous to put him on the ballots

While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf’ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

I have never read a harder cope sentence than “sharp concurrence”. Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

RIP in peace old friend

I was honestly gonna guess 7-2 or something like that, with the dissenters arguing about how being impeached should impact legal ability to run again or something similar and technical, but without real standing

Liberals continue to be more pathetic than expected

ain’t that the dems in a nutshell. “you’re doing exactly what we would do, but too much and too loud!”

The rollin’ coal Trump Train leads to fascism.

The Trump Train with the lib caboose also leads to fascism. But it’s important to recognize that it’s a diesel and it goes slower. Also the libs want Americans to know they are working as hard as they are able are to get permission to paint a rainbow flag on their train car.

I’m pretty sure diesel trains are faster than coal trains. After all, Hitler didn’t actually win any elections; he was appointed by Paul von Hindenburg.

“Sharp concurrence” lol

Cannot write a more succinct and damning summary of democrats and libs in general

I didn’t know “scathing dissent” had an even worse sibling.

I entirely forgot about concurrences. I have a TIL comment lower in this thread - https://hexbear.net/comment/4663388

Democrats learned their lesson with FDR. Can’t risk having too much power or you might be expected to use it.

“We, democrats, have learned our lesson with FDR. We can’t risk having too much power or we might be expected to use it.” The narrator says: “Biden/Harris 2024.” Tired Old Joe comes back and says: “I’m Joe Biden and I approve this message.”

Damn, that’s crazy. Sounds like the US supreme court is some kind of fascist institution that the Joe Biden administration will surely destroy in their efforts to prevent American Fascism, Right?

court dem judges are like living civility bits

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don’t post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

RIP @InevitableSwing(hexbear.net)

chapotraphouse

!chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Community stats

Community moderators