After all everyone knows blood diamonds are green

57 points

Paying thousands of dollars for something that drops most of its value in just a few years can leave the buyer feeling cheated

How is that any different from non-synthetic diamond rings? lol

permalink
report
reply

This is 90% of things

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

other things have use-value, sentimental value doesn’t depreciate, and they’re overpriced anyway

there’s no universe in which this is anything other than the whining of a (hopefully) dying industry

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Interestingly diamonds are neat example of differences between value and price because they undoubtedly do have use value in real industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

There’s a lack of blood of exploited minor miners for one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Why are they talking about cars all of a sudden?

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Coal is so bad, much worse than the natural way of obtaining useless rocks.

CW - image of colonial exploitation:

A South African miner getting x-rayed to ensure he didn’t steal from De Beers diamond company. 1954

This image alone should be reply enough to these articles.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

My lord Odin that’s an excessive radiation exposure. Fuck De Beers

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I remember someone posted an article a while back about this. The company cops would check workers’ clothes, hair, mouths, butts, and balls for diamonds too. Imagine being so worried about profits that you hire penis inspectors to make sure miners can’t keep a few itty bitty rocks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Cartels usually skip this process and just make the workers be naked

permalink
report
parent
reply

you can still eat a diamond when you’re naked

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I expect diamonds to fall off entirely in the next decade or so. Their (natural, later artificial) scarcity and (manufactured) tradition was all they ever had.

permalink
report
reply

(synthetic) Moissanite is cheaper and more sparkly anyway, if you’re going for shiny

permalink
report
parent
reply

My wife’s ring is moissanite, it was less than 1/10th the price of an equivalent carat diamond ring and you literally can’t tell the difference. We both decided that we would rather spend that money on literally anything else. The mohs hardness is 9.5 for moissanite vs 10 for diamond which is practically the same, assuming you aren’t using it as a beyblade vs a diamond ring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Diamonds have a lot of practical value for jewelry because it’s damn near impossible to damage them in everyday use, which can’t be said for more brittle gemstones.

That said, synthetic diamonds will likely completely replace traditional ones except for people that want to reuse family heirlooms or something similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They have many industrial purposes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Yes I’m aware of that, but we aren’t talking about industrial diamonds

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Ackshully”

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Gen z/ millennial getting yelled at solidarity

permalink
report
reply
22 points

I like how they chose “oblivious” rather than something like “unaware.” I wonder what vocabulary they choose to use for generations that overlap better with their subscriber base.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Writing news articles like Victorian pen pals to impress my editor at Fortune Magazine

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 405K

    Comments