Permanently Deleted
I mean actual anti-imperialist war is extremely good, but this is inter-imperialist war
Putin Cringe
Azov Cringe
Wagner Group Cringe
US/NATO cringest for engineering this situation
Putin’s invasion = traditional nationalist imperialism + taking NATO’s bait. Claims of “denazifying” ukraine maybe bad faith, idk. I don’t live in Putin’s head.
US/NATO = Capitalist imperialism as described by Lenin
Libs say “NATO-haters love putin”
NATO-haters curled up in corner with shotgun screaming “I HATE NATO I HATE NATO”
Relevant info: NATO made in 1949 BEFORE the warsaw pact, to “combat soviet aggression” right after WW2 ended. Staffed by former nazis. Germany got way more reparations than USSR did. Read Washington Bullets by Vijay Prashad.
Lenin literally invaded Ukraine, which at the time was recognized as a “sovereign nation”, where the only real base of Bolshevik support was in the Donbas… You’re posting this in bad faith. Revolutionary defeatism would apply to the US in a war against Russia but not in Ukraine vs Russia.
I don’t care who the rightful owner of Ukraine is I just don’t want escalation into a nuclear war
⚠️ TRADE OFFER ⚠️
I receive: higher fossil fuel profits.
You receive: a mild nuclear exchange.
That won’t happen. The western Bourgeoisie doesn’t care that much about Ukraine.
There is so much more going on there that I am too tired to touch, but suffice to say, there was not a sovereign nation of Ukraine at the time, it was several self-proclaimed states and “recognized” is a strong word outside of the great powers that had been given control of a given nation’s ports.
You don’t have to explain anything to me. I’m ethnic Russian (child of an immigrant) and am close with my family there. I grew up learning about Russian, and specifically Soviet history. I understand that it wasn’t the same as the current Ukrainian government being accepted as a unitary sovereign nation, but it was considered not part of the new Bolshevik regime by any serious power. It’s very complicated but Lenin did indeed invade to establish the Ukrainian SSR when the only Bolshevik supporters were in the Donbas or a handful of rebels in major cities like Kiev. My main point is that the concept of revolutionary defeatism against Russia is bogus. The CPRF isn’t going to use this to their advantage and seize power in Russia lol.
The CPRF for sure will get nothing from this, but that doesn’t change that I disagree on the Bolshevik involvement in Ukraine. It was more than a handful in Kiev, the Bolsheviks in Kiev had fallen back however AFTER the Bolshevik uprising in November of 1917 which led to the creation of the Central Rada and thus the creation of the Ukrainian People’s Republic. There was no nation for anyone to recognize until after Bolshevism had significantly become a thing in Kiev, and not by force through Lenin.
They fell back to Kharkiv (east but bordering the north of Donbas for anyone reading our convo who is unaware) because it was a stronger position, and because the central rada had turned on them. The UPR was recognized, or at least witnessed by France, Romania, and Italy on November 27th with the 3rd universal declaration, which importantly did not consider Ukraine a separate nation, but rather an autonomous region of the Russian state. The 4th came in January of 1918 and overwhelmingly voted to become independent. The British don’t recognize the 4th Universal and a fully independent Ukraine until January 22nd of 1918, after the December 1917 military confrontation between the Red Army and the UPR in Bakhmach, and the Bolsheviks leaving the All-Ukrainian congress of Soviets which then recognized the UPR both on the same day december 17th. On december 18th 1917 the Russian Bolsheviks declare war on the UPR. As well as earlier in november Bolsheviks in Vinnytsia west of Kiev seize the city and attempted to move to capture Kiev but got stopped and deported in december. They take Kharkiv on december 26th.
I don’t want to be pedantic, I get and frankly agree with your point, but I do want to clarify for others some of the timeline, as well as refresh myself. Cause it is not only not really that similar, its also the case that the UPR was not recognized as separate from the Russian state until after the Red Army invaded, which came months after serious Bolshevik influence in Kiev, completely homegrown. It was not just Donbas, Kharkiv, and some pockets in other cities, those groups in other cities had significant influence and roles up to the point of war. One that is pretty debatable as to whether the soviets even declared war on a recognized independent Ukraine given the timeline of independence, recognition, and recognition of independence being different but close
didn’t mean to offend, just the history is worth pushing back on a simplification that gives the wrong idea. The red army was in Ukraine prior to independence, and armed revolts west of the Dnieper occur before anyone recognizes a Ukrainian government “considered not part of the new Bolshevik regime”
But yeah revolutionary defeatism makes no fucking sense here and now. We are not talking about countries with serious communist parties and union movements, being thrown into a pointless and drawn out meatgrinder totally unforeseen in its innovations of how brutal war can be. WW1 is a unique situation, one that we cannot fully appreciate but only acknowledge. It was conductive to the kind of revolts and desertions it saw in a way no other war could be
And nice to see people come here as a place to discuss the war, hopefully we are more accepting and welcoming than :reddit-logo: and the like right now
Just don’t use gendered slurs and stay chill. Consider this a warning since you have an older account. Convos about the Ukraine conflict are fine if you can discuss it calmly.
Imperial war bad, civil war possibly good, class war in the form of civil resulting in revolution is best
:tromp: Hexmods best mods, everybody’s saying it folks!
