Chapo said that if it was put to a vote, the majority of Americans, chuds and libs alike, would vote for all the homeless to just “go away” in some unspecified way, as long as it was done quietly and out of sight.

I think they were right.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Relevant :citations-needed:

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

A “Sanctuary District” so to speak

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hardly. We just use prisons. Millions of Americans shoved into prisons, from coast to coast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

“They move in” yes because they’re always outsiders, an invading horde, never people from those communities.

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Or runs a highway through their old neighborhood.

permalink
report
parent
reply

:this: One of the reasons why encampments are so messy is because they are destroyed periodically. The poor in this country are not allowed to build their own shelter of any kind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Libs: :bugs-no:

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

This even if you don’t like the homeless, give them homes. It solves so many social problems. I hate the “fuck you I got mine attitude” that permeates all of American culture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I see people complaining about homeless people going to the bathroom outside (by dumpsters or trees specifically).

BITCH THERE ARE NO PUBLIC RESTROOMS IN THIS CITY! WHERE ELSE ARE THRY GONNA SHIT? THEIR HOMES?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I understand this desire, but the cost of land is so high in the Bay that giving folks a place entails buying new land with astronomical sums of money or repurposing already-scarce public land (read: parks) for homeless, which turns it into a zero-sum game likely to breed more animosity.

Now, could the cities simply not have sold off all their land ages ago? Yes. Could the cities simply not have abused their power of eminent domain to build freeways so much that blowback led to a significant curtailing of the latitude of this power? Also yes.

But now we’re here, and don’t act like leftists don’t also get mad when cities are like “here’s a Tuff Shed under a freeway overpass”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I hear you, I understand you, I hate all of you and propose a different solution :mao-wave:

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So much of that land is just parking lots for strip malls of national chain retailers and fuddruckers

permalink
report
parent
reply

as always, the white moderate will say the slogans and then perpetuate the violence

permalink
report
reply
24 points

It’s really something how true that first page of State and Revolution holds up over a hundred years later. And by something I mean depressing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it.”

upvote to oof instantly

:stress:

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
15 points

If we’re using the environment as some type of bullshit excuse, it is also absolutely worse how they tear these down every couple weeks and throw them away and people have to go and get new ones for them to be torn up again. Fuck them

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 444K

    Comments