You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
20 points

You really think dog phrenology is gonna fly here? You’d understand it’s just a Trojan horse for race science right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Please read the source material.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Wtf I just played out how your precious dog phrenology is dubious science with sources. I’m not fucking having this argument again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Hexbear stop being weird about random shit challenge [failed]

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

If you take a look at my responses you’ll see I’ve made one specific point, which is that the concentration of DNA an organism inherits does not say anything inherently about what traits are expressed in that organism. In this situation, a dog having less than 50% Pit Bull DNA doesn’t mean anything without knowing the function of that DNA, let alone what we mean by "Pit Bull DNA"1.

As far as I know that’s just how genetics work, just the same as how my siblings and I each carry 50% of our mother’s DNA, but it’s not necessarily the same 50%, if that makes sense.

I would also advise a second look at your sources as the tweet at the end of the list has been deleted and I couldn’t find it in the wayback machine.

1Is this DNA within the canine genome, in keeping with the methods in the study you linked by Gunter, Barber, and Wynne? Or is it shared DNA in the broader sense, (like how humans technically share a large amount of our genetic code with bananas, albeit this is boilerplate stuff like "how to make a cell). I would assume the former, but since it’s not sourced I can’t tell. After searching the quote I found it verbatim in this listicle, which also does not directly provide the source.

Just refreshed and saw that my other posts got removed so I suppose this one isn’t too long for this world

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

did you just compare humans to dog breeds?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No I pointed out the racist origins of pitbull hysteria and BSL redlining. Are you that obtuse? Or do you just internalize unscientific racist bullshit because it “feels right”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You’re saying that analyzing the behavior of different breeds is equivalent to phrenology, which implies that human “races” are as equivalently different from each other as dog breeds are, which is of course nonsense and racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That is true, Im not disputing that, but comparing the differences between dog breeds, which are wildly different morphologically, is not equivalent to phrenology and race science. Human races are not morphologically different from each other, race is a social construct.

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@hexbear.net

Create post

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it’s a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we’ll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 142K

    Comments