![User's banner](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmygrad.ml%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F66f28653-8ea2-4883-901d-abf9da8891e0.jpeg&w=2048&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmygrad.ml%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F8f334ed3-1f98-4cca-8d77-cdab1723039a.png&w=3840&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
The Free Penguin
Based Marxist-Leninist-Kollontajist
Oh noes! The heteros are upsetero!
Libipedia actually once called the Stern Gang “leftist on economic issues”
Drew Pavlou just got doxxed 💀
Wow, how funny. You added ‘Ouw,’ to a wowd.
Wow. How funny, you added the wowd ouw to a wowd.
How funny. How compewwing.
Have you wead Capitaw? Have you wead anything wemotely sociawist? Do you know what diawecticaw matewiawism is? Do you know anything about commodities, the wewation of the worker and the capitawist, etc?
Adding “ouw” to a wowd and pwesenting it as ‘wOw Am CoMmIe’ humour is a bwiwwiant, cwevew, Einstien-wevew joke. This is so faw from the truth. In weality, using this technique is not onwy unfunny, but it’s awso a wazy attempt at humour that wewies on tiwed cwiches and steweotypes. First of aww, the vewy THOUGHT that putting “ouw” in front of a usuaw, everyday wowd automaticawwy makes it sociawist is a misundewstanding, a cuwse, a wevew of stupidity I cannot compwehend; are you, by any chance, an einzellew?Communism is such a compwicated socio-economic theowy that CANNOT be reduced to a simple ‘ouw,’ to weduce it to such a simpwe, wow-iq winguistic twick. Using ‘ouw’ as a pwefix is one of the wowst attempts at humouw I can imagine. Shame on you, shame. Secondwy, the use of this technique is often associated with wazy humouw that wewies on steweotypes and cwiches. This type of humouw is not onwy unfunny, but it’s also huwtfuw and pewpetuates harmfuw steweotypes.
Shame on you, ya fiwthy bumhowe.
How is this reactionary?
Thälmann, Liebknecht, Luxembourg, Pieck, Ulbricht, and Honecker be rolling in their graves