User's banner
Avatar

idkmybffjoeysteel [he/him]

idkmybffjoeysteel@hexbear.net
Joined
119 posts • 816 comments

Everybody jealous of my 100 house plants

Direct message

Without AI animation I would not have Giga Ralph or Dancing Homer on TikTok.

permalink
report
reply

I finally gave Death Stranding a chance this week, and as a die hard Metal Gear fan since 1998, I can say that the writing is complete and utter shit. I had already been disappointed by the lack of dialogue in MGS5, but DS really took it down a notch further. I can’t begin to describe how bad it really is, from an inconsquential and random meeting with another courier within the first minute of the game and immediate introduction to the underwhelming horror elements of the game, to boring exposition delivered by a short-lived corpse disposal worker, and another boring meeting with your mother, the president, whom you the player have ZERO emotional attachment to. The game is so poorly written that I honestly believe the rumours that the earlier MGS games were written by someone else. The game is boring, and it isn’t because you play a delivery boy delivering packages, the gameplay is kind of fine, it’s because the writing is totally incompetent, which is a shame because the world and some of the ideas are very interesting. Total waste of a good cast.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Part of the reason for this is due to player response to original Civ, which was designed with rise and fall in mind. Players would shit the bed and quit the game when things started going south, and the game was rebalanced so that this wouldn’t happen. It’s a shame, because strategy games are at their best when you’re forced to struggle against impossible odds.

permalink
report
parent
reply

He does. He also suffers from the same brain worms as other removed eg rapists, where he believes that just because he thinks something, therefore everybody else also secretly thinks that despite their protestations to the contrary. Incredibly arrogant.

permalink
report
parent
reply

OK because you asked nicely:

  1. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)
  1. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
  1. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

Apparently the unabomber never heard of the concept of critical support.

This next bit is a little long but gives a good demo of Ted’s nonexistant understanding of theory:

  1. Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.
  1. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.
  1. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.

Why can’t these darn leftists just quit their complaining >:(

  1. The leftist of the oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today’s leftists are NOT in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally, freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at least of its middle and upper classes [4] for a long time. These values are explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational system. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these principles.

Dude just straight up denies that systematic issues exist, while apparently retaining enough presence of mind to understand that the system needs to be taken down. In place of acknowledging class and power, subjugation and exploitation, Ted instead offers us political correctness gone mad and hobbies bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply

sounds like Degeneres

permalink
report
parent
reply

I am so shocked people can’t recognise this is satire that I think they are faking it to troll me.

permalink
report
reply

then they repeat only the last few words which you already heard

permalink
report
parent
reply