![Avatar](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhexbear.net%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F1bcdcc4d-acd7-447f-85b1-30c42881e57f.png&w=3840&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
doublepepperoni [none/use name]
I haven’t dared to start playing RDR2 yet, but how much of a simulation is it actually? The thing that frustrates me about Rockstar games is that for all the insane level of attention they put into the most minute of details, the simulation elements just kind of awkwardly float on top of incredibly loose arcadey gameplay and can safely be ignored because the games need to be able to be completed by dads who only ever buy like 3 games for their consoles
In a just world Rockstar’s budget and resources would be redistributed to like the Stalker devs to create the most lavish Slavjank game in existence
Meanwhile I, as someone who actually did play on PS1 as a kid, always try to get rid of polygon warping, dithering, etc while also cranking up the resolution when emulating PS1 games. Like the things that I liked about old games weren’t that they ran at 20 fps and were rendered at a postage stamp-sized resolution
Maybe you should try the first game since it’s a bit more cartoony/GTAy in its tone