“She’s kind of trying to do good or whatever she’s trying to do, and she’s losing — I mean, I don’t know,”

Alright so similarities:

1. She’s a loser
2. She’s rich

I don’t know guys, this one kind of tracks.

It also feels very ideologically Hillary Clinton. If everyone were logical, they would come around to my enlightened third way. Thankfully we have Natalie with her silly dress up for the rest of you idiots.

Notably, King County is named after slaver William R King, not Martin Luther King Jr.

American chauvinists aren’t sending their best!

I assume there’s professional jealousy because when James Cameron produces a three hour long project, you actually get something out of it.

In my experience, literally every single person who says some shit like “Shaun’s videos are great but his Twitter sucks” is just a Democrat who’s mad that he doesn’t think the Democrats are the good guys.

People need to understand class interest beyond “worker good, Capitalist bad, workers come together and sing kumbaya really hard until Communism happens.”

If it were that simple, we would be living in Communism right. It’s not that simple. A couple of examples: steel worker union wants the price of steel to be as high as possible so union members are compensated well. Union of… idk, pipe builders want steel to be as cheap as possible for obvious reasons. Despite both groups consisting exclusively of proles, they have contradictory interests.

Another example that’s been highlighted by recent DSA actions: class reproduction. Academic “Marxists” generally lose all radicalism because they’ve secured a position where they can write for a living instead of doing one of the million jobs that no one wants to do. This applies perhaps even more strongly to paid positions within “Socialist” organizations. Why did Maria of the DSA behave with such profound chauvinism on the Cuba trip? Because she sees a path out of working for a living. Everything she did established credibility in the eyes of the people who hire Democratic Party staffers.

And the single most important example in the world today: Americans. A nation ostensibly composed of the working class like any other, yet all but the most vulnerable of its population are so profoundly bribed with the superprofits of the actual global working class that their interests have been thoroughly aligned with the status quo. They constitute a parasitic class on the world stage. Why do the most useless counter-revolutionary tendencies (LeftCommunism, Council Communism, Trotskyism, Neokautskyism) come exclusively from the West? Because the population does not, for the most part, experience revolutionary conditions. They don’t need to do a revolution because they will be fine no matter what.

And this isn’t some wild, new, 21st century theory. No less than Marx, Engels, and Lenin all described the parasitic nature of British “workers” and their attempt to secure well-being on the backs of the global proletariat: “…The English proletariat is actually becoming more and more bourgeois, so that this most bourgeois of all nations is apparently aiming ultimately at the possession of a bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois proletariat alongside the bourgeoisie. For a nation which exploits the whole world this is of course to a certain extent justifiable.”

The US is the Fourth Reich and the two flavors of politics are Nazi and Nazi in Flower Headband.

Lmao it’s wild that on a Communist forum, the position “carrying out genocide is never acceptable” is controversial.

People also trying to own Luna by pointing out that her family used to be landlords and now have 500 square meters of farmland, and… good? That’s called land reform.

As someone who’s worked both kitchen and office jobs, almost every single office worker would shit themselves to death if they had to do kitchen work, whereas nearly every cook or dishwasher could do an office job with a day’s training.