![Avatar](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscuss.tchncs.de%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F29f0da17-3330-47ee-97a1-b51ee98e2b48.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
Fisch
Didn’t know about his. I’m currently using GNOME Console (Mainly because it’s GTK 4) but this looks really cool. It uses GTK 4 and has more features. I may just switch to it right now.
Really cool how even phones in that price range have 120hz screens now, my current phone (Nothing Phone 1) is also in that price range and has a display like that. IPhone users should really be madder at Apple for not putting 120hz screens on the non-pro phones, even though they cost way more than these Android phones.
A Minecraft Earth using this would be fucking awesome, maybe I’ll get around to making it one day
If they wouldn’t allow this, signing into YouTube wouldn’t work
Couldn’t you just compare the energy usage of Laptops or desktop PCs with native support running Linux compared to the energy usage when running Windows on them? I have a PC with an AMD GPU and CPU so my hardware is fully supported, I could actually test it. I think a laptop would be better to test on tho, since a desktop PC might not be trying to use as little power as possible in the first place.
No, PipePipe and NewPipe work the same way and load the data from YouTube’s server by extracting the information they need (including the video stream) from the website. Piped is a project that uses NewPipes’ extraction but puts it on the server side. Piped has to be hosted on a server but that server extracts the information from the website and then sends it to the client, thereby proxying it to you. With Piped, your device never contacts the YouTube servers itself. LibreTube is a FOSS Android app, that’s also on F-Droid, that uses Piped.
From the benchmarks it seems like it’s actually a noticable improvement over Llama 3. Llama 3 was already a lot better than Llama 2 (from actually using it, not just benchmarks), so I’m really interested in how good this actually is in practice.
Coming back to this, what you said at the end was really interesting. I could manually split up the file and run the frame extract script for each one at the same time but do you know if it’s possible to automate this? Or even better, run each instance of ffmpeg on the same video file and just extract every nth frame, like I said in my earlier reply?