Falling for it or making light of it? seems like the latter to me but I’m a dumbass so
What you’re missing is that I’m just posting things with whatever headline will make people laugh.
Did you have to space it out in capital letters because if you’d written it “oic” people might interpret it as a French person saying “wack”
This is a subway line metaphor
It’s okay. The Real numbers are dense (within the real numbers), so no matter how many branches we make, we’ll always have just as many real numbers jammed arbitrarily close together on all branches!
But what if we add one branch for each subset of the set of all real numbers.
Just ¶ more lane bro
We are cooking with manifolds
EDIT: wait, no, WTH am I saying? At the forking point, that thing is not locally homeomorphic to R^n for any natural n.
Time to commit eepy.
It is if you delete the forking point no? So just make it fork at Chaitin’s constant or some other real number no one will notice missing.