You could get rid of both Biden and Trump, whoever replaced them would be beholden to the same imperial corporate interests and be just as vile with their policies.
You could do Putin or Zelenskyy in, and another capitalist oligarch would just take their places.
If Netanyahu disappeared tomorrow, Israel has plenty of genocidal politicians ready to fill his boots.
The real world isn’t a Marvel movie, there is no single “ultimate bad guy” to rally against. The entire systems of these places need to be overcome.
Scapegoating Bibi is also stupid because it doesn’t explain the unwavering loyalty the West has expressed towards his government.
Liberals try to pretend that there’s a substantial Israeli “resistance” that isn’t pro-genocide and Bibi’s just an unpopular Trump-like figure.
They need to pretend this to validate the state of Israel itself as a fascist apartheid ethnostate committing genocide is entirely damning and they need to cling to Zionist versions of a Clean Wehrmacht.
I don’t think this is entirely fair, it depends on your definition of “substantial”.
Israel like anywhere is a country with people with a range of opinions. A large percentage dislike Bibi, and there certainly will be a number of Israeli people who are anti-genocide, you can see their parliament has a wide range of parties in it. Doesn’t justify any of Isntrael’s actions.
“Substantial” has clearly not been enough to amount to any perceivable resistance to an occuring crime against humanity. Israel is a very small, very new settler colony; it’s residents who are not Palestinian have far less of an excuse to be there and simply “checked out” than those in other settler colonies.
It also makes them believe that “public servants” are a monolithic entity that does the bidding of the legislature or head of state, rather than, say, cops having interests of their own.
There is nothing wrong with denouncing American plutocrats like Bezos and Gates for greed, but we cannot stop there: we must understand that the system of exploitation is not held together by any individual’s vices. As Lenin put it, “The capitalists divide the world, not out of any particular malice, but because the degree of concentration which has been reached forces them to adopt this method in order to obtain profits.” [10] If one of them had a major change of heart and stopped pursuing ruthless accumulation, they would quickly be ousted by stockholders for endangering their investment. In the unlikely event that their stockholders were cooperative, a competitor would swoop in and relieve them of their commanding market share. This is not apologia for Bezos, but we need to understand that there is a talent to being a capitalist exploiter, or else we will underestimate our enemy. The market selects for profitability, and it selects well — it just doesn’t select for environmental responsibility or decency or who can bring the most benefits to the greatest number. From Marx, to Lenin, to Deng, we can observe a baseline level of respect for the enemy: “Management is also a technique.” [11]
On my view, the core Marxist insight is the following: Feudal lords were the masters of Feudalism. Capitalists, however, aren’t the masters of capitalism. They are merely the high priests of capitalism. The master of capitalism is Capital itself.
trump
