32 points

Best part of old cars is no bazinga bullshit

Oh sorry your 4th view camera stopped working, we cant start your car now wouldn’t be safe

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Being on the ass end of the car interactions in the world I’d rather the bazinga mobiles don’t start without all the external gizmos, sensors and cameras because they are absolutely designed with them in mind as necessities and not as options, having sacrificied all sightlines for passenger safety

Car safety has absolutely ruined cars, the regulations need to be relaxed a lot

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Sure, but that’s cold comfort when you’re trying to get to work

Strong old man yelling at cloud energy but back in my day we were taught to check our blind spots and back up without cameras

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Back when you actually could check blind spots tbf, most cars have A-pillars a foot wide now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sure, but that’s cold comfort when you’re trying to get to work

Yeah so is everybody else not in a car that gets endangered by those ass-sightlines bazingamobiles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Cameras and sensors imo go in the category of genuinely useful safety features. Probably quite a lot of people are alive today because of reversing cameras.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Backup cameras are worth every cent they cost just to prevent running over kids who aren’t tall enough to be seen in the rear view mirror.

Tesla gave a lot of useful safety tech a bad name by deploying a half baked system in a overconfident way, the stuff other manufacturers are putting out is legitimately useful safety tech. It’s expensive for now, but it will get cheaper and save a lot of lives.

Forward collision detection systems slow down cars enough to prevent fatalities, lane warning systems prevent accidents from drivers who fall asleep by shaking the steering wheel and beeping. Adaptive cruise control can prevent pileups because it can quickly react to dense traffic slowing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

if they could EV correctly and make them safe, durable, and intuitively maintained, so many models of vehicle from 1970-1990 would absolutely crush.

i used to own a 1990 GMC Sierra 1500 OBS [old body style] (20 years after it rolled off the line, lmao… fucker had half a million miles, diesel!). i was a farm worker, so i used the shit out of it, but the truck felt huge and capable to the task. like i could pick up a 1-ton pallet no problem and bring it back over the hills to the farm. though some of the hills it was more of a “0-60 in 3 miles” situation.

of course, compared to its modern successor, the 2024 Chevy Silverado, it was 4" shorter by width, 36" shorter by length, and had a 1 foot longer bed. it wasn’t also trying to be a 4 door sedan, but it had a big vinyl bench so it was easy to fit 3 adult dudes in it, or more routinely another dude and a normal dog in the cab.

when i think of the potential, i hate our car and truck market. it’s all just shit. every vehicle is the same attempted jack of all trades, except designed by and for someone who has never worked a trade. so it’s a frankensteined shitpile that sucks at everything, sold entirely on vibes to someone who wants to affect a personality trait. and has a 500% marked up center console with enough computing power and connectivity to launch a satellite. and every vehicle costs like $30k, but really costs like $60k when you factor in 84 month financing and non-negotiable “options”.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Yep, there’s a reason why the modern work truck is a full sized van with the back seats stripped out. And even those are expensive because people are living in them

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

A regular cab and long bed is something that people want/need. It’s not that there isn’t a market for it… it’s just that in the last 30 years pickups have become desirable for a much, much larger segment of the market: people who don’t actually need something like that - they want 5 seats and only use the bed for buying flowers at the hardware store. Posers, basically. And the way scale works in auto manufacturing they can really only make one (auto makers try to trim down the options/makes/models, it’s why Ford eliminated the majority of their cars in the US a few years back).

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Trucks have a larger profit margin for manufacturers (in part from shit emissions regulations in the US favoring larger vehicles) so there’s a lot of push to sell trucks over other styles. There’s more money being made in a 5-seat truck over a 5-seat sedan or SUV.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

If it’s good enough for the Taliban, it’s good enough for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

picked one up for like $4k 4 years ago, can confirm

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m dying on this hill.

Because you mounted a .50 cal on it and will fight to the end?

permalink
report
parent
reply

That era Ford is easy to maintain, too

permalink
report
reply
17 points

You could say it was a-ford-able to maintain

permalink
report
parent
reply

Knock it off

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

If you think you can general-ly motor-vate me to not make puns you’re chevy-erely mistaken.

permalink
report
parent
reply

cars

!cars@hexbear.net

Create post

===============/c/cars================

Hexbear’s premier community for the discussion of and questions about cars, motorcycles, and other low occupancy transit. Share your thoughts, discuss cars under communism, and ask questions about maintenance.

Anti-car posting is not permited. Train good car bad and all, but it’s not what this comm is for.

Community stats

  • 296

    Monthly active users

  • 426

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments