it’s over bros

75 points
*

Aaron Swartz , a reddit founder, believed in this. He believed it so much he literally broke into databases and stole the entire contents of all scientific journals with intention to release it all. The man had real beliefs and he was willing to get dirty and do it himself and fuck the laws that are in the way.

In 2011, Swartz was arrested by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) police on state breaking-and-entering charges, after connecting a computer to the MIT network in an unmarked and unlocked closet, and setting it to download academic journal articles systematically from JSTOR using a guest user account issued to him by MIT.

He would have radicalised years down the line if the state hadn’t hounded him until he killed himself. I genuinely believe he would have been one of us.

Sci Hub is blocked in the UK by court order btw. Have to VPN to get to it.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

he literally broke into databases and stole the entire contents of all scientific journals with intention to release it all

Fwiw his legal defense rested on evidence that he intended to do a meta-analysis of climate change data to see if it was being suppressed compared to other subjects. But that could have easily been a cover. It’s not like he hadn’t made data public before either.

Either way, I would have followed Aaron to the ends of cyberspace. RIP, comrade

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

I believe he was everything that made reddit a success in its earlier years. Things like the massive anti-SOPA campaign absolutely would not happen today, it was clearly driven by him.

Early relationships with moderators, the real community that reddit had back then, the fostering of relationships and so on… All Swartz in my opinion. Certainly some missteps with the free speech absolutism that led to reddit’s early pedo controversies, but he was a half lib half ancap with real beliefs that were clearly connected to when the internet was COOL and run by pirates. 🏴‍☠️ He would have continued down that path.

Reddit would be completely fucking different today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Damn. Just realized, was Aaron Schwartz the seed of all my current political views? Shit

permalink
report
parent
reply

Also MarkDown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The only good redditor :fidel-salute:

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

… is a dead redditor :soviet-hmm:

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A deadditor

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

i think you guys are deluded, he’d be a libertarian techbro with the occasional good twitter take

probably 90% of libertarians i’ve met have been against IP, it’s the one thing where they end up agreeing with commies, though for totally different reasons

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

No, you should read his Guerrilla Open Access Manifesto (https://archive.org/stream/GuerillaOpenAccessManifesto/Goamjuly2008_djvu.txt). Pretty sure he was never, and probably would never be a techbro.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But sharing isn’t immoral — it’s a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.

yea this is not the libertarian argument against IP, guy was legit

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did he kill himself or “kill himself”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Pretty sure it was a suicide, brought on by the state harassing him relentlessly. There’s a whole thing to it, but my memory is too fuzzy to explain it from memory now lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply

he was gonna go to jail for 30-something years for stealing research papers from JSTOR, so he killed himself

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No, it was a real suicide. They tried to make an example out of him by prosecuting him relentlessly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Long story short, he was driven to suicide by USA authorities.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Liking or generally having an appreciation for Lenin and his theoretical developments is a litmus test for whether or not somebody has good politics imo. Always good to see Lenin. Never a bad time.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Anarchist Lenin appreciator here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

:left-unity-4:

permalink
report
parent
reply

:meow-hug:

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Like how the hell can anyone ignore that his work led to massive improvements to the material conditions of millions of people and one of the most socially progressive states of its time.

Honestly as close to uncritical support as I can have for someone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Heterodox syndicalist here - Lenin’s contribution to understanding Marx, understanding the forms of cooptation that are created by imperial structures, and specifically to the criticism of Kautskyism are incredibly valuable. Regardless of sectarian tendency, Lenin should be read by everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Lenin should be read by everyone.

Absolutely, the two books I recommend most to people that really seem interested in getting into reading Marxist theory are State and Rev and Blackshirts and Reds

They’re both fairly short and complement one another quite a lot almost to the extent of being in conversation with one another.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Even well intentioned libs I knew thought Lenin was the “good guy”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Copyright is a fuck download them all 1 trillion .zip

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

I remember someone here reposting Elbakian’s rant about how great Stalin was. I have a friend who follows her escapades closely and the woman is a bit of an eccentric, to put it mildly.

permalink
report
reply

The modern academic journal system and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race

permalink
report
reply

My research ethics class on Tuesday tried to drill into us that actually it’s good and right to not tell your student about a solution to their problem because you learned about the solution by peer reviewing a paper, and their right to confidentiality overrules the waste of time, labor, resources, and even animal lives.

I was literally the only one who said “Maybe this confidentiality thing is actually bullshit and we should just share the info?” And everyone acted like I was fucking insane.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That’s insane. If someone’s student were working on a problem I’d written about, I’d want the peer reviewer to share at least some of my thoughts with them. I suspect that it comes from the insane paranoia about getting “scooped” that all academics are forced to have in virtue of hiring/promotions/tenure being tied to publications, and publications being tied to “novelty.” The way the system is organized is actively hostile to collective problem solving and knowledge sharing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Me too!!! Make it so we don’t survive based on publications and “being first.” There should be exactly 0 expectation of confidentiality when it comes to research, the whole fucking point is for this shit to be public knowledge so other people can base their own research on the foundation you’ve added to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Fascism runs deep in the academic field of science, from Women and POC having their research stolen from them, to data being flat out fabricated for political gain.

Imagine what kind of a future we could have if we could root out all that white supremacy and capitalist rentseeking.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You can recommend a paper without peer reviewing it, that argument makes no fucking sense or am I missing something?

permalink
report
parent
reply

In this hypothetical the paper hadn’t been published yet. The professor in the story reviews a shitty paper, gives feedback, and then her student comes to her saying she’s having an issue that would be solved by the exact thing used in the reviewed paper, and the questions were all variations of “Is it okay for the professor to share this information?” And making it very clear that the “correct” answer was a resounding no, which is insanity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The implication is that the paper was not published yet, as it was undergoing peer review.

permalink
report
parent
reply

100% I wrote a booklet on the topic, which covers both the failures of for-profit publishing and a list of demand for academics and the public to organize around! https://socialistcanada.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/booklet-for-public-ownership-and-democratic-control-of-scientific-publishing-v4-1-1.pdf

permalink
report
parent
reply

That’s fantastic! I’ll definitely be sharing this with colleagues.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to Hexbear’s science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

Community stats

  • 405

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 36K

    Comments