A projection of how the election results would look if we used Additional Member System (AMS), like in Scotland and Wales.

Party AMS FPTP Seat change
Labour 236 411 +175
LibDems 77 71 -6
Green 42 4 -38
SNP 18 9 -9
Plaid Cymru 4 4 0
Reform 94 5 -89
Conservative 157 121 -36
Northern Ireland 18 18 0
Other 4 6 +2
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
12 points
*

…but if you give people the opportunity to list preferences, they don’t vote the same way. Tactical voting goes out of the window, and people are free to put what they actually want as their first choice.

I favour STV for this reason, but AV would have been an improvement too. AMS retains a single choice IIRC and for that reason I would never support it’s use. Also the AMS list means big parties can just put all their top choice people on it and almost guarantee their election.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The Electoral Reform Society also favours STV, they probably chose AMS here as modeling it from FPTP isn’t complete guess work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which is fair in an academic sense, but it scares the willies out of people who don’t understand it’s one of the least likely systems we’d use and how important the choice is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/voting-systems/

I don’t even know how STV would work for electing MPs. That’s for electing groups of people?

AV to rank the candidates would make sense, unless I completely misunderstand STV.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’d merge constituencies together and have multiple representation. For example: 5 neighbours become one region and elect 5 people.

An additional benefit is that people have a choice of representative to go to when wanting to consult “their MP”. None of this “I want to talk about the homelessness problem in my area but my MP is a Tory” issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

So let me understand the proposal. We merge MP regions so each Labour/Tory candidate is running against their respective Labour/Tory candidate in another region in addition to the opposition in their opponent’s in their existing constituency?

I assume the purpose of this system is it allows an independent to capture votes from multiple areas, so fringe groups will get minor representation instead of the least popular candidate from the major parties?

[Edit] And if you only have a candidate in your area for your favourite party doesn’t tow the line and is marginally racist, you can vote for another candidate for that party that fits your taste?

permalink
report
parent
reply

UK Politics

!uk_politics@feddit.uk

Create post

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

Community stats

  • 507

    Monthly active users

  • 860

    Posts

  • 2K

    Comments