Permanently Deleted

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Instead of seeking a warrant for which officers did not have probable cause, the New Jersey State Police subpoenaed the testing program to obtain the blood sample of a child, now nine years old, whose father was suspected of committing the assault, the New Jersey Office of the Public Defender claims.

So no warrant. Also maybe I don’t understand the US legal system, but federal law supersedes state law doesn’t it? And HIPAA is federal law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

:rat-salute-2: thank you. Holy fuck write your patient privacy laws better why on earth are there so many exceptions

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Ngl I’m still not convinced that this was legal at all, even with our very minimal protections.

Unrelated though, stupid line in that FAQ:

Some other Federal or State law may require a disclosure, and the Privacy Rule does not interfere with the operation of these other laws

Motherfuckers why don’t you understand what you are? You are a federal law limiting information sharing. The whole point of that is that it overrules state laws. State laws should mean nothing to you and if a state says “We have a law” you should say “Sir this is a Wendy’s sit down.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

doomer

!doomer@hexbear.net

Create post

What is Doomer? :(

It is a nebulous thing that may include but is not limited to Climate Change posts or Collapse posts.

Include sources when applicable for doomer posts, consider checking out !bloomer@www.hexbear.net once in awhile.

Community stats

  • 561

    Monthly active users

  • 575

    Posts

  • 6K

    Comments