Obviously, the Olympics as it currently exists has a lot of problems - building stadiums over poor neighbourhoods, using slave labor (or close to it), promoting nationalism, etc.

But do you think the concept of “People from different countries (or regions or whatever once borders are removed) around the world compete to see who can run the fastest, throw things the furthest, jump the highest, and so on, and win some kind of prize based on their performance” is a fundamentally good one or not?

And if it is good, how do you think it would be different to the regular Olympics?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

The idea is that the new host undergoes a series of huge architectural projects in preparation for the games, and these building stay around as new fancy buildings for the locals to use. Of course it doesn’t really work out that way because capitalism, but I see no reason why we couldn’t continue that but have it actually do what it says on the box.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, that’s a neat idea. The games themselves could be more like a celebration of a big public works project and the local culture, rotating around from place to place as the need arises for new infrastructure.

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 7K

    Posts

  • 171K

    Comments