JamesConeZone [they/them]
4:21 PM PT – A source who has spoken with a member of the Secret Service tells TMZ, Trump was not hit by a bullet. Rather, a bullet hit his teleprompter and the glass struck him by the ear.
Thank you Mr President
I guess the foundational question is, is this a person that is “convinced by arguments” or are you wasting time? The clearest argument against that to me is that transgenderism has existed in every culture for thousands of years, before big pharma was even a thing. hell, before capitalism as we know it was a thing.
effort post explaining eunuchs and non gender conforming people in the ancient world using the bible as an example
for example, there is a range of non-cis people represented in the Bible. Genesis 1:27 refers to Adam as “it” (oto, singular) and “them” (otam, plural) in the same sentence; male and female, created in the image of God. The rabbis understood this to mean that Adam was created as an intersexed as early as the 2nd century CE (Eleazar ben Azariah), meaning the plurality of sexes/genders is a reflection of God themself. More here and here.
Hundreds of years later, we have a eunuchs following Jesus in Acts 8. For some ancient context–not just Jewish but Greco-Roman–, eunuchs are considered neither male nor female, but a non-conforming third type of human. Laertius 4.43 says “men can become eunuchs, but eunuchs can never become men.” Lucian too writes “a eunuch was neither man nor woman but something composite, hybrid, and monstrous, outside of human nature.” Plenty of other writers describe them as a “third type of human” e.g., not fitting into binary cultural expectations (Philo, “neither male nor female”; law excludes from sacred assembly “those whose generative orders are cursed/cut off, who refashion the masculine type into a feminine form”). In Judaism, eunuchs were not allowed to worship publicly (Deut 23); the prophets envisioned a future in which gentiles and eunuchs would be included in God’s people (Isaiah 56).
When we encounter the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8 (representing someone literally and figuratively “far away” from Jesus’ ministry), they ask St Philip: “What is to hinder me from being baptized?” We are to expected to literally say “the fact that you are a eunuch.” But Philip immediately stops the chariot and baptizes the eunuch, a symbolic act for inclusion into God’s people. The story conveys the inclusion of the marginized into the people of God, but also that multidimensional gender identity can and should be represented in humanity.
There is more here with Greco-Romans considering Ethiopians to be a people that bend gender norms, but I’m getting away from the main point which is that non gender conforming people–whether intersex, nonbinary, transfem/masc, or another identity–have always been with us. We’re just now allowing them to speak without being spoken over.
