Reform UK has come under pressure to provide evidence its candidates at the general election were all real people after doubts were raised about a series of hopefuls who stood without providing any photos, biographies or contact details.

“UNABLE TO ISSUE CITATION TO COMPUTER,” say dispatch records, AZCentral writes. Arizona law does allow officers to give out tickets when a robotaxi commits a traffic violation while driving autonomously; however, officers have to give them to the company that owns the vehicle. Doing so is “not feasible,” according to a Phoenix police spokesperson quoted by trade publication Repairer Driven News earlier this year.

It’s possible, but they usually tend to infiltrate NGOs, not create them and do the work. But do you have any proof?

Follow-up story to https://lemmy.zip/post/18440178

The firm has not commented on the possibility of customer data exposure yet, presumably because the investigation is still in its early phase.

Any countries want to stop all funding until claims can be investigated, or do they prefer to stick to their double standards?

All of them are considered in tandem, not individually.

Considering that OpenAI is making a commercial profit from developing its ML models

They are losing money during development (all those GPUs are not free and running them costs a lot of energy), they are making the money after it’s trained. Just factual inaccuracy.

And being used for commercial purpose is not automatic rejection. Take YouTube, where fair use comes up constantly. Almost all the cases are for commercial purpose, but most qualify under fair use.

#3 also because the model usually ingests the entire work, not just part of it.

While they are trained on full works, the used work in the result is different. Probably minimal considering the size of the models. The fact that some courts already ruled that “AI” works can’t be copyrighted gives weight to the argument that it’s a unique work.

It’s very hard to argue that “AI” generated is different from someone looking at the original and making a copy by hand. And since the latter is allowed, by the same token is the former.

At this point, it’s unclear what’s the extent of the incident and how many HubSpot customers were affected.

While TeamViewer states there is no evidence that its product environment or customer data has been breached, its massive use in both consumer and corporate environments makes any breach a significant concern as it would provide full access to internal networks.

Checkout coffeezilla/voidzilla coverage if you haven’t seen it yet.