Apple, Microsoft, Sony…it’s cool to hate them but can we please direct some fucking ire to this absolute pinnacle of piece of shittery that’s always on the frontier of the shittiest business practices in all things IT?

How has this compamy escaped a class action lawsuit by the entire population of the world?

44 points

Due to union rules i am actually not allowed to hate Adobe more than I currently do sorry.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

This company is literally just taking the piss and you’re allowing it to happen?

‘Please subscribe to our Premium experience to access this ugly ass font’

What the fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I’m just making a “union rules” joke. I use gimp, inkscape, and a bunch of other stuff. I despise adobe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Is there an open source alternative to acrobat? That’s all I fucking need.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Your white hot ball of rage has been burning other employees recently Frank, we need you to settle down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

When I was in college and we got student license edition I always preferred to use on principal alone…and it somehow performed better than the licensed edition.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Ealways, it’s always like this. I almost expect customer support to better for pirated copies

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I will literally never use Adobe software. My wife pirated some but I do not bother using it.

permalink
report
reply

this tbh, I will put up with a lot of jank to escape subscription fees, especially predatory “monthly” (yearly) fees

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

To be real I don’t think the GNU Image Manipulator even has that bad a UI. Like yes it’s convoluted but A) that’s literally Adobe’s fault B) you need a wiki for both anyway

permalink
report
parent
reply

True, I just haven’t spent the time to properly learn it since I dont do much graphic stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I think it’s because they aren’t quite as ubiquitous. Most the people heavily involved with Adobe products do so for creative work, and that’s a relatively small niche comparatively.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

They literally own pdfs, which have some how become necessary in every business and government administration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sure, that’s about the extent of the everyday use case, a shitty file format. Im not talking about search, email, calendar, operating systems, and all kinds of other things you will regularly touch on the internet.

In not saying Adobe isn’t prominent, just comparatively a lot smaller.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

It’s crazy to me that Adobe has managed to to make any money. Their software products at their core are pretty solid, however all of their products are covered in barbed wire and throned vines. The idea that basic features require a subscription is beyond bonkers to me. I don’t know how they managed to survive the 90s at all.

I hate Adobe, all my homies hate Adobe, and it’s deeply frustrating there has not been a meaningful alterative yet.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

businesses buy the licenses for their employees

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the affinity suite is a good alternative if you’re not on linux, not that adobe supports linux last i checked. There’s also https://www.photopea.com/ Really depends on the use case, plenty of better painting options out there now. For photo editing, a dedicated raw editor can cover a lot of territory. For compositing heavy stuff, I use gimp or even blender. inkscape is awesome for vector work.

i could go on. i think a lot of people forget how difficult it was to learn adobe software when they started, and it’s tough to switch and lose that muscle memory, but even if the alternatives aren’t as good, most have been improving over the years and adobe has just gotten worse and worse. Redirecting money from adobe to alternatives will accelerate that.

It’s also much easier to write scripts for adobe alternatives, so it’s possible to get productivity boosts in that domain, depending on how you work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They survived the 90’s because they weren’t subscription-based back then. They could charge a lot more, but they had to actually invest in development so that clients would be willing to pay for an upgrade. Once development started stagnating, and they had an enormous market share, they could switch over to the subscription model and start charging people to access the software (and their files) in perpetuity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They could charge a lot more, but they had to actually invest in development so that clients would be willing to pay for an upgrade.

That one thing I hate about technology as it is. It’s not modern tech is inherently bad, it’s that technology is engineered around becoming more profitable rather than better. They aren’t making better products anymore, they just finding new ways to charge you for them. UGH.

permalink
report
parent
reply