Tech Bros out here building truth boxes so they don’t have to think critically.
The problem with the one you posted specifically isn’t even related to anti-communist bias. Here’s one statement that gave it a downgrade:
Capitalism brought with it an unprecedented expansion in social mobility, both upward and downward.
Rating: Mostly False
Also, the llm is rating novel analysis (such as “Marx looked at the differences between kings and capitalists”) as false, because there isn’t much literature that already discusses things in those terms. So, if you don’t want the bazinga bot to give you an F, you aren’t allowed to say things in new ways that aren’t already established in the literature. What a bright future we have
The author advocates for Marxism as a relevant response to contemporary capitalist critiques, but demonstrates a bias towards socialist ideologies.
Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
idk why but reading the first few of these it comes off as like a ultra marxist, it gave redsails an F because it wasn’t marxist ENOUGH
Suggested Correction: Fierce denunciations of Marx are not uncommon, but a more prevalent tactic is to pay vague respects while underappreciating the complexity and depth of his work, particularly in areas such as his critique of colonialism and ecological issues.
I mean? translation to me: these posers need to read more Marx, then get on settlers, motherfucker
I couldn’t get it to clear the thing already loaded into it so i had to google the site and enter the image from the homepage
