China is probably not yet ready to mount a complex air-sea invasion of Taiwan, with the mighty USA at its back. But it would have no real difficulties making land invasion into Russia.

Taiwan… not yet, too hard, but Russia is officially a GO opines our dunk tank subject, further free military advice for China can be found in the article

Geopolitics is just a map painting game to these people. When your borders are bigger thats good. Why would you not want your borders to be bigger? Graduated from Total War university with a PhD in Medieval 2 crusade strategies.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Biden should seduce Xi and have sex with him to own Putler and Brumpfk

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Got downvoted to hell on .world the other day for saying “maybe, hear me out, China doesn’t consider invasions because it’s not a militaristic, expansionist country?”

permalink
report
reply

They hated you because you spoke the truth

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think it probably could be fairly defined as either but I would also grant you that they could be considered to have much different goals as a whole than Western militaristic and expansionary endeavours and that, generally speaking, they balance those goals against a wider group or population than you would see the West doing.

Are they happy to expand into contested zones? Absolutely. Will they make shows of force to do so? Absolutely. If it means a protracted military solution though then that’s not going to happen, they’re not interested. They will attempt to find a commercial solution or they will just wait for an opportunity over a very long period of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Are they happy to expand into contested zones?

Isn’t that… the definition of contested zones? Like, Morocco contests Ceuta and Melilla, Spain contests Gibraltar… and there’s endless political tension from these issues.

They will attempt to find a commercial solution

Doesn’t this go against the definition of militarism?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Doesn’t this go against the definition of militarism?

“War, trade, and piracy together are a trinity not to be severed.”

90% of wars are for commercial interests, and the rest are sus too.

permalink
report
parent
reply

China isn’t going for a domination victory. They’re clearly after a science victory. That’s why they chose the communism government for the production bonus. It makes more sense to maintain their level 2 alliance with russia for extra gold to buy builder units that can speed up lengthy spaceport projects.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Literally this

permalink
report
parent
reply

There is no other way to interpret this than as someone who’s been kept in sensory deprivation with only 4x games then asked to write about the real world.

Like dude should be writing articles critiquing the strategies of twitch streamers not governments irl

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Your comment did an excellent job of matching his energy lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Why though?

Stupid idiot with no conception of anything beyond map painting games.

Why attack Russia? They couldn’t occupy it, you would need to erase the local language and replace it with Chinese which isn’t going to be something you get away with in current China not to mention the way the rest of the world would use this. Takeover or occupation is off the table. So what else? Install puppet that does what you want? Russia is already trading with China and doing what they want (mostly). What benefit does China get out of this? Unfair trading relationship? They’re communists, not capitalists, a colonial style unfair trading relationship like the west enters into by installing puppets everywhere in the world is not ideologically on the table for them.

It’s so fucking stupid. It really highlights how stupid these people are and that they really don’t understand anything at all.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

“Attack your biggest ally so we can have easier time attacking you later. Sincerely, your biggest enemy” - nothing more than that, and even US diplomats are like that just not this openly, so what you expect of some random journo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Many Chinese (ultra)nationalists have long dreamed of retaking Vladivostok (Haishenwei), which is still one of the painful points along Sino-Russia relations and many see it as a great humiliation that must be avenged. The goal is to weaken Russia so much that eventually Russia has to cede Vladivostok back to China.

It will also cut Russia off from access to the Pacific (one of the most salient problems for both Russia and the USSR that have shaped their geopolitics in the Far East for more than a century) that could further subjugate Russia under China’s control.

This may not happen now but eventually China will want it back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This may not happen now but eventually China will want it back.

Because some Chinese boomers cry about it,or is there a material reason you think so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Don’t see anything like this happening unless there’s regime change in Moscow and Russia becomes a western puppet. On the contrary, it seems that cooperation in far eastern ports is what’s on the actual table.

Ultras are just being ultras.

permalink
report
parent
reply

This reads like someone really trying to get the new player in their diplomacy game to make a huge misplay

permalink
report
reply
56 points

Does China know that alt + f4 brings up enemy spy locations?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Ukraine’s not even a supply center; Russia needs to take Budapest by the end of autumn if they want to build this year.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 448K

    Comments