- Civilization 1: Released 1991, civs included Aztecs
- Civilization 2: Released 1996, civs included Aztecs and Sioux
- Civilization 3: Released 2001, civs included Aztecs, Inca, Iroqouis, and Mayans
- Civilization 4: Released 2004, civs included Aztecs, Inca, Mayans, and Native American
- Civilization 5: Released 2010, civs included Aztecs, Inca, Iroqouis, Mayans, Polynesians, and Shoshone
- Civilization 6: Released 2016, civs included Aztecs, Cree, Incans, Maori, Mapuche, and Mayans
- This clown: “The Cultural
BolshevistsMarxists are trying to RUIN CIV by adding Native Americans!”
SMH at these fake gamer boys trying to push their politics into our hobby
My favourite “civ is woke now” argument is that district placement emphasizes the local geography’s influence on your civilization, which is marxist and woke. And like… how the fuck were you playing civ before? Even without civ VI forcing you to be more mindful of it geography is obviously always huge in a 4X. It’s literally the first 3 Xs! And it’s the 4th X in any game with remotely interesting combat.
SMH at these fake gamer boys trying to push their politics into our hobby
No no no you see the only FAKE gamers are GIRLS even if they’ve been playing Civ since 1991.
wait they had specific north american civs before regressing to ‘native american’ in 4?
Yeah, it was…a very strange decision. They have Sitting Bull as their leader, Dog soldiers as their unique unit and Totem poles as their unique building. It’s uhh…not great.
